[802SEC] RE: PAR and 5 Criteria for 802.11k with additional information
Folks,
This was sent to the SEC reflector on October 11
but I don't think it ever got there so I am resending it.
Best regards,
Harry
Harry R. Worstell
PTSM - Broadband Transmission Research
AT&T Labs - Shannon Laboratory
Vice Chair, IEEE 802.11 Working Group
Room B233, Building 103
180 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 971
Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971
Phone: +1 (973) 236-6915
Fax: +1 (973) 360-5873
EMAIL: hworstell@research.att.com
<<Harry Worstell.vcf>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Worstell
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:53 PM
> To: 'stds-802-sec@ieee.org'
> Cc: 'Al Petrick-Icefyre'; 'Stuart.Kerry@philips.com'; 'Paine, Richard
> H'; 'hworstell@att.com'
> Subject: FW: PAR and 5 Criteria for 802.11k with additional
> information
>
> From: "Stuart Kerry" <stuart.kerry@philips.com>
> To: <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
> Cc: <apetrick@icefyre.com; hworstell@research.att.com;
> richard.paine@boeing.com>
> Subject: PAR and 5 Criteria for 802.11k with additional information
> Date: Friday, October 11, 2002
>
>
> Dear 802 SEC members:
>
> This is notification under the 30-day rule that 802.11 is planning to
> submit a new
> PAR at the November meeting to address Radio Resource Measurements in the
> 802.11 MAC and PHY.
>
> Attached for your review is the PAR and 5Criteria ( to be designated as
> project 802.11k) which was drafted by the Radio Resource Measurement Study
> Group and approved by the full Working Group at its September meeting in
> Monterey.
>
> This activity has attracted considerable interest within 802.11, with
> Radio Resource Measurement Study Group attendance averaging 50 or so
> people from over 35 companies. The authorization to start a the study
> group was originally approved in the May 802.11 session with a vote in the
> WGN-SC of 54 approve, 4 disapprove, and 6 abstentions and in the WG
> Plenary with a vote of 72 approve, 12 disapprove and 17 abstentions. In
> the September session the text of the PAR and 5 Criteria was completed and
> they were voted on in the study groups evening session to submitted them
> to the Working Group with a vote of 14 approve, 0 disapprove and 0
> abstentions. In the September 802.11 Working Group Plenary session, the
> Par and 5 Criteria was approved to be sent to the SEC for the start of a
> Task Group with a vote of 78 approve, 0 disapprove, and 1 abstentions.
>
> This project is to define measurements and develop mechanisms to provide
> 802.11 wireless network measurement information to higher layers and new
> applications.
>
> We took the opportunity to have this reviewed by the Jodi Haasz of the
> IEEE office. She made some suggestions and was satisfied that appropriate
> language was included in the PAR.
>
> Stuart Kerry,
> Chair - IEEE802.11 Working Group
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Worstell
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:15 AM
> To: 'stds-802-sec@ieee.org'
> Cc: 'Stuart.Kerry@philips.com'; 'Paine, Richard H'; 'Al
> Petrick-Icefyre'; 'hworstell@att.com'
> Subject: PAR and 5 Criteria for 802.11k
>
> From: "Stuart Kerry" <stuart.kerry@philips.com>
> To: <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
> Cc: <apetrick@icefyre.com; hworstell@research.att.com;
> richard.paine@boeing.com>
> Subject: PAR and 5 Criteria for 802.11k
> Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:00 PM
>
>
> Dear 802 SEC members:
>
> This is notification under the 30-day rule that 802.11 is planning to
> submit a new
> PAR at the November meeting to address Radio Resource Measurements in the
> 802.11 MAC and PHY.
> Attached for your review is the PAR and 5Criteria ( to be designated as
> project 802.11k) which was drafted by the Radio Resource Measurement Study
> Group and approved by the full Working Group at its September meeting in
> Monterey. This activity has attracted considerable interest within 802.11,
> with Radio Resource Measurement Study Group attendance averaging 50 or so
> people from over 35 companies. This project is to define measurements and
> develop mechanisms to provide 802.11 wireless network measurement
> information to higher layers and new applications.
>
> We took the opportunity to have this reviewed by the Jodi Haasz of the
> IEEE office. She made some suggestions and was satisfied that appropriate
> language was included in the PAR.
> Stuart Kerry,
> Chair - IEEE802.11 Working Group
>
> << File: 11-02-337r9-RRM-PAR-for-Radio Measurement.doc >> << File:
> 11-02-340r7-WNG-Draft_Radio_Measurement_5-Criteria_11.doc >>
>
>
Harry Worstell.vcf