RE: [802SEC] Re: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
Bob -
The last Sponsor recirc that I needed to run had a similarly short period -
seems like that is what the balloting service is defaulting to these days.
Regards,
Tony
At 11:31 15/01/2003 -0800, Grow, Bob wrote:
>Roger:
>
>Looks like Mike beat me on the second. I should warn you though I will
>probably oppose conditional approval for submission to RevCom if you are
>only allowing 10 days for Sponsor recirculation as outlined on your
>schedule (based on draft availability, I don't understand why the
>abreviated ballot time).
>
>--Bob
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Takefman [mailto:tak@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:24 AM
>To: Paul Nikolich
>Cc: Roger B. Marks; stds-802-sec@ieee.org; stds-802-16@ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] Re: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
>
>
>
>Second
>
>mike
>
>Paul Nikolich wrote:
> >
> > Roger,
> >
> > You'll need someone on the SEC to second the motion first.
> >
> > If there is an SEC member that is willing to second the motion, please
> > indicate that to me and Roger.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > --Paul
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
> > To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
> > Cc: <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>; <stds-802-16@ieee.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:56 PM
> > Subject: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
> >
> > > Paul:
> > >
> > > I request that the following motion be entered as an SEC email ballot:
> > >
> > > MOTION: To forward IEEE P1802.16.1/D2-2002 ("Draft Standard for
> > > Conformance to IEEE Standard 802.16 - Part 1: Protocol Implementation
> > > Conformance Statements for 10-66 GHz WirelessMAN-SC Air Interface")
> > > for Sponsor Ballot.
> > >
> > > Here is an explanation:
> > >
> > > The Working Group Letter Ballot results are clean. 802.16's Letter
> > > Ballot #9 ("To forward IEEE P1802.16.1/D1-2002 for LMSC Sponsor
> > > Ballot") ran from 21 Nov to 21 Dec. The results were:
> > >
> > > Approve: 41 Disapprove: 0 Approval Ratio: 100% [75% required]
> > > Abstain: 8 Ballots: 49 Return Ratio: 59% [50% required]
> > > Comments: 77
> > >
> > > Responses were developed by a Ballot Resolution Committee, and
> > > P1802.16.1/D2 was issued. The comments, responses, and draft were
> > > subject to 15-day Recirculation Ballot #9a (31 Dec 2002 - 14 Jan
> > > 2003). No responses were received. Therefore, the ballot is closed
> > > and final.
> > >
> > > For a full report of the Letter Ballot, see
> > > <http://ieee802.org/16/tgc/C1/ballot09/report9.html>.
> > >
> > > I am asking for an email vote instead of waiting until the March
> > > meeting because I believe that approval will give us an excellent
> > > chance of making the 14 April RevCom deadline. Here is the schedule:
> > >
> > > http://ieee802.org/16/tgc/C1/schedule.html
> > >
> > > The Sponsor Ballot Group is already in place.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Roger
>
>--
>Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
>Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
>Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
>2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
>voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
Regards,
Tony