[802SEC] ballot update +++ SEC EMAIL BLLOT +++ MOTION: Authorize the Link Security Executive Study Group to become an 802.1 Study Group
Dear SEC,
The vote tally as of 12noon EST Feb 20 2003 on the below SEC Email ballot
is:
Vote categories: DIS DNV APP ABS
-----------------------------------------------
01 Geoff Thompson DIS
02 Mat Sherman DIS
03 Buzz Rigsbee APP
04 Bob O'Hara DIS
05 Bill Quackenbush APP
06 Tony Jeffree APP
07 Bob Grow APP
08 Stuart Kerry DNV
00 Bob Heile DNV
10 Roger Marks DIS
11 Mike Takefman APP
12 Carl Stevenson DIS
13 Jim Lansford DNV
14 Mark Klerer APP
total: -5- -8- -6- -0-
8 APPROVES required to PASS.
The ballot remains open until 2PM EST Friday Feb 21 2003. Please remember
to cast your ballot before the deadline.
Regards,
--Paul Nikolich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
To: "IEEE802" <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
Cc: "Dolors Sala (E-mail)" <dolors@ieee.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:04 PM
Subject: [802SEC] +++ SEC EMAIL BLLOT +++ MOTION: Authorize the Link
Security Executive Study Group to become an 802.1 Study Group
>
> Dear SEC,
>
> This is a 10 day SEC email ballot to make a determination on the below SEC
> motion to authorize the Link Security Executive Study Group to become an
> 802.1 Study Group. Moved by Tony Jeffree, seconded by Bob Grow.
>
> The email ballot opens on Wednesday February 11 2PM EST and closes Friday
> February 21 2PM EST.
>
> Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul Nikolich
> Chairman, IEEE 802 LMSC
>
> MOTION: "The SEC resolves that the Link Security Study Group will become a
> study group of the 802.1 HiLi working group, effective from the start of
> the March 802 Plenary meeting."
>
> MOVER: Tony Jeffree
> SECOND: Bob Grow
>
> background material:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Jeffree" <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
> To: <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
> Cc: "Dolors Sala" <dolors@ieee.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Link Security Monday morning session announcement
and
> update
>
>
> >
> > Paul has suggested (and Dolors agrees) that we might decide the
placement
> > of the SG ahead of time by means of an Email motion; this would have the
> > advantage of allowing more time to discuss over the Ether than might be
> > available during the opening SEC meeting in March, and would also free
> > Dolors to make best use of what will be a crowded agenda in March.
> >
> > I would therefore like to make the following motion:
> >
> > "The SEC resolves that the Link Security Study Group will become a study
> > group of the 802.1 HiLi working group, effective from the start of the
> > March 802 Plenary meeting."
> >
> > I believe that Bob Grow is happy to act as a second.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tony
> >
> > At 08:39 08/02/2003 +0000, Tony Jeffree wrote:
> >
> > >Dolors -
> > >
> > >802.1 clearly needs to formally confirm the decision, which it can do
on
> > >Monday afternoon. However, as 802.1 made the offer to the SG to become
an
> > >802.1 SG at the end of the November meeting, this should be a
formality.
> > >So, I don't see any problem with moving the SEC decision to Monday
> morning
> > >- I would also prefer this option.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Tony
> > >
> > >At 01:29 08/02/2003 -0500, Dolors Sala wrote:
> > >>Geoff, I do plan to attend the Exec meeting on Monday morning and
assign
> > >>someone to run the session.
> > >>
> > >>However, I like Howard's suggestion of changing the placement of the
> project
> > >>on Monday (instead of Friday) to free me of the exec meeting if the
> rules
> > >>allow us to do so. The SGs are chartered until the closing exec
meeting
> of
> > >>the following plenary. But if this can be moved to Monday, it would
> help. It
> > >>would be my preferred option.
> > >>
> > >>I think the decision can be moved to the beginning of the meeting
> because
> > >>the opinion of the Link Security members was clear with the straw
poll,
> and
> > >>no further discussion is needed. The poll was done when we were in
> session
> > >>together with 802.1. So it is representative of 802.1 members too. But
> I'll
> > >>let Tony comment if he thinks 802.1 needs this meeting to confirm the
> > >>decision.
> > >>
> > >>Dolors
> > >>
> > >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>From: "Howard Frazier" <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
> > >>To: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
> > >>Cc: "Dolors Sala" <dolors@ieee.org>; <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
> > >>Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:15 PM
> > >>Subject: Re: [802SEC] Link Security Monday morning session
announcement
> and
> > >>update
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Since the Link Security Study Group members seem to
> > >> > want conduct their work within 802.1, it might
> > >> > be appropriate to change the study group from an ECSG
> > >> > to an 802.1 SG. If you do this early Monday morning,
> > >> > the Dolors won't have to stick around through the SEC meeting.
> > >> >
> > >> > I appologize if I have just trod heavily on Tony's or Dolor's
> > >> > toes.
> > >> >
> > >> > Howard
> > >> >
> > >> > Geoff Thompson wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Dolors-
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Who is going to run the Monday morning meeting?
> > >> > > You are supposed to be in the Exec until (at least) your proposal
> is
> > >> > > approved.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Geoff
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At 05:42 PM 2/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Dear SEC members,
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The Link Security SG discussed the placement of the project in
the
> > >> > >> first SG meeting on January in Vancouver. The decision was to
> place
> > >> > >> the project in P802.1. A brief summary of the meeting, including
> > >> > >> straw poll numbers, is included at the end of this message.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Based on this decision, we (802.1 and LinkSec) are already
> planning
> > >> > >> the March meeting together. We are scheduling a Link Security
> session
> > >> > >> on Monday morning (8:30-10:30am) to encourage participation from
> all
> > >> > >> WGs by avoiding overlaps with regular WG meetings.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Please forward the announcement and information below to your
> > >> > >> respective WG members.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Thank you,
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Dolors
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> ---------
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> IEEE802 March 2003 Plenary Meeting
> > >> > >> Monday Morning Link Security Session Announcement
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The Link Security ECSG is scheduled to meet on Monday Morning
> > >> > >> (8:30-10:30am) March 10t. This session does not conflict with
most
> WG
> > >> > >> regular meeting schedule. It is intended to facilitate
> participation
> > >> > >> from all WG members since the work of this group relates to
> several
> > >> > >> WGs efforts.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The agenda for this meeting is to educate each other on the
major
> > >> > >> areas related to this project (e.g EPON, bridging, security),
> > >> > >> converge on scope, scenarios and objectives and make progress on
> the
> > >> > >> work plan including architecture model, project partitioning and
> PAR
> > >> > >> definition. See work plan at
> > >> > >>
> >
>
>>http://www.ieee802.org/linksec/meetings/MeetingsMaterial/Jan03/LinkSecWork
> Pl
> > >>an_0103.pdf
> > >> > >> .
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Contributions deadline: March 3rd, 2003 midnight PST
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Submission instructions: To submit your contribution please send
> it
> > >> > >> by email in pdf format to dolors@ieee.org, dromasca@avaya.com
> > >> > >> <mailto:dromasca@avaya.com> , and allyn@cisco.com
> > >> > >> <mailto:allyn@cisco.com> . In your email please indicate title
of
> the
> > >> > >> presentation, name of the presenter and amount of time needed to
> > >> > >> present the material. Also if you are a member of another WG and
> have
> > >> > >> schedule conflict, please indicate so.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The complete Link Security meeting schedule is posted at:
> > >> > >> http://www.ieee802.org/linksec/meetings
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> -----
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Summary of Link Security Jan 2003 interim meeting in Vancouver:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The two-days meeting covered the presentations including
> discussion
> > >> > >> on requirements, architecture model, and PAR and 5 criteria, and
> > >> > >> lengthy discussion on scenarios, placement of the project and
the
> > >> > >> need of traffic analysis. The group also discussed the location
> and
> > >> > >> dates of the next interim meeting.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Major decisions made:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 1. The SG will recommend to the executive committee in the
next
> > >> > >> IEEE802 plenary meeting to place the project in 802.1
> > >> > >> 2. The next interim meeting in May will not be co-located
with
> EFM
> > >> > >> in Korea, but will be in Ottawa hosted by Nortel late May
> early
> > >> > >> June and co-located with P802.3 10GBASE-CX4, P802.3
> 10GBASE-T
> > >> > >> SG, and P802.1.
> > >> > >> 3. Developed an initial set of scenarios. See
> > >> > >>
> >
>
>>http://www.ieee802.org/linksec/Meetings/MeetingsMaterial/Jan03/LinkSecUsag
> eC
> > >>ases_0103.pdf
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 4. A work plan for development of project PAR(s) was
> identified.
> > >> > >> See
> > >> > >>
> >
>
>>http://www.ieee802.org/linksec/Meetings/MeetingsMaterial/Jan03/LinkSecWork
> Pl
> > >>an_0103.pdf
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 5. Three technical tutorials will be prepared for next
plenary
> > >> > >> meeting to introduce SG participants to the three major
> areas
> > >> > >> involved in this project. The areas are Bridging, EPON and
> > >> > >> Security. The volunteers to organize or prepare the
> tutorials
> > >> > >> were: Norm Finn ( nfinn@cisco.com
<mailto:nfinn@cisco.com> )
> to
> > >> > >> prepare the Bridging tutorial, Jonathan Thatcher (
> > >> > >> Jonathan.Thatcher@worldwidepackets.com
> > >> > >> <mailto:Jonathan.Thatcher@worldwidepackets.com> ) to
> organize
> > >> > >> the EPON tutorial, and Bill McIntosh (
> > >> > >> bmcintosh@fortresstech.com
> <mailto:bmcintosh@fortresstech.com>
> > >> > >> ) to prepare the Security tutorial.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Summary of Straw Polls
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 1. Where should the next LinkSec Interim meeting be held?
> > >> > >> Specifically, are you will to go if:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> a. Co-lo with .3 in Seoul - 14
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> b. Co-lo with .11 in Singapore - 10
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> c. Meet with late may June in Ottawa - 30
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 2. Who thinks the approach outlined by Mick for development of
the
> > >> > >> PAR(s) is a good one?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Yes - 36
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> No - 0
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
> > >> > >> "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 3. Are you in favor of moving this SG group to 802.1?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Yes - 26
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Negative - 0
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Abstain - 12
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Tony
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tony
> >
> >
>