RE: [802SEC] 802-SEC reflector delay
Maybe it's time to call Luigi Napoli at IEEE-HQ for a reading on what is going on with their mail server ???
Thanx, Buzz
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Heile [mailto:bheile@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:51 AM
To: Rigsbee, Everett O; Bill Quackenbush; IEEE 802 SEC
Subject: RE: [802SEC] 802-SEC reflector delay
Buzz
I have had exactly the same experience as Bill recently. When I announced
the Network meeting in DFW, I knew some of you got it since I got
replies. I did not get my copy for 4 days. I resent it with direct names
because I had no idea who got it and who did not.
Bob
At 03:01 PM 3/20/03 -0800, Rigsbee, Everett O wrote:
>Bill, Two interesting things that I note from this:
>
>1. You 2nd message actually arrived before the 1st message arrived, so
>service is not even FIFO.
>
>2. Your 2nd message took 40 minutes just to get to IEEE.
>
>It looks to me like your local email server is experiencing some serious
>difficulties. It's your SMTP not your KARMA !!! :-)
>
>Thanx, Buzz
>Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
>Boeing - SSG
>PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
>Seattle, WA 98124-2207
>(425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
>everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:23 PM
>To: IEEE 802 SEC
>Subject: [802SEC] 802-SEC reflector delay
>
>
>All,
>
>I recognize that some/many/most of you may have little interest in this
>topic, but I find my recent experience with my emails on "802.20
>affirmation" rather curious.
>
>As you probably know, I sent an email on the above topic Tuesday and
>then resent the email on Wednesday as I had not received my copy for the
>initial email from the 802-SEC reflector. I have now received my copy
>from both transmissions, but after significant delays (> 34 hours and >
>13 hours). Just for amusement, I asked Buzz Rigsbee for his copies on
>the emails. The total end to end delays for his copies were both under
>7 minutes. (The delays times were extracted from the complete email
>headers. All times were converted to GMT.) The details are in the
>following table
>
>Any thoughts? Maybe I have the wrong karma.
>
>Thanks,
>
>wlq
>
>
>
>In the following table, dates are in the format YYMMDD and
>times are in the format HH:MM:SS. All event times are GMT.
>
>
> Initial Initial Resent Resent
>Event/ email to email to email to email to
>Item wlq Buzz wlq Buzz
>------ -------- -------- -------- --------
>
>Sent 030318 030318 030319 030319
> 19:11:55 19:11:55 15:16:29 15:16:29
>
>Received 030318 030318 030319 030319
>by 802-SEC 19:12:02 19:12:02 15:56:32 15:56:32
>reflector
>
>Received 030320 030318 030320 030319
>from 05:32:08 19:17:42 05:24:23 15:59:07
>802-SEC
>reflector
>
>Last 030320 030318 030320 030320
>timestamp 05:32:08 19:18:28 05:24:23 15:59:15
>in header
>
>
>Total path 34:20:13 00:06:33 13:27:54 00:02:46
>delay
>
>802-SEC 34:20:06 00:05:40 13:27:51 00:02:35
>reflector
>delay
Bob Heile, Ph.D
Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
Chair, ZigBee Alliance
11 Louis Road
Attleboro, MA 02703 USA
Phone: 508-222-1393
Mobile: 781-929-4832
Fax: 508-222-0515
email: bheile@ieee.org