Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I vote
Approve.
While
personally I believe the requirement should be less permissive, that is the
subject for a rules change, not an interpretation.
Having
not confirmed a Chair of 802.20, it is incumbent on the SEC to fill that role
until a WG Chair is confirmed. I believe the proposed interpretation is
the correct one for handling membership of 802.20.
I cannot speak about the intent of those that crafted this rule, but my
understanding as an early 802 participant
was of a basic intent that minimum attendance of 50% at plenary sessions is
required to remain a member (voter). The two of four rule clearly
anticipates that missing two successive interim sessions would not cause
immediate loss of member rights.
Though
I am very sympathetic to Tony's position, were I a WG Chair during startup under
these rules, I would be compelled to retain members consistent with the
proposed interpretation. Agreeing with Tony's logic, if challenged, I
would be granting membership through the discretion of the Chair to all that
attended the initial session until the 2 of 4 rule is not satisfied per the
proposed interpretation.
--Bob
Grow
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@att.net] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 5:23 PM To: IEEE802 Subject: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation Dear SEC, ----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 5:57 PM
Subject: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation Paul,
I wish to formally make a motion concerning the interpretation of the current initial membership rules. The motion I would like to make is as follows:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Motion that until the P&P
revision titled "WG membership" being balloted starting March 27th, 2003 is
completed (estimated to occur at the end of the July 2003 IEEE 802 Plenary
meeting) the line in the LMSC P&P section 5.1.3.2 titled "Retention"
reading:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff Thompson helped develop this motion, and has agreed to second it. Note that based on recent discussions it is somewhat different than the motion I said I would first make on the reflector. This motion maximally protects the voting rights of initial members by ensuring retention of their rights through the first 4 plenary sessions. We believe this is the motion that has the greatest chance of success. If this fails, we may want make a second motion which we would want to complete before the end of the upcoming wireless interim session. Since the motion is reasonably concise we would prefer a 15 day ballot period for this interpretation to allow time for a second round if needed.
Regards,
Mat Matthew
Sherman
|