Re: [802SEC] Fwd: 1 Week delay on note posted to reflector
Forwarded for Luigi, who is not subscribed to this list.
-Bob
-----Original Message-----
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 10:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Luigi Napoli <lnapoli@ieee.org>
Reply-To: l.napoli@ieee.org
To: Howard Frazier <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
cc: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>, <nbisiolu@ieee.org>,
spa-admin <spa-admin@ieee.org>, <k.rupp@ieee.org>,
<stds-802-sec@ieee.org>,
<j.longman@ieee.org>, <a.ortiz@ieee.org>, <m.persons@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Fwd: 1 Week delay on note posted to reflector
Howard,
To follow up on the majordomo delay problems, the second majordomo
server
is now up and running. We will test it for a couple of days using some
staff majordomo mailing lists. The working group mailing lists will
then
be migrated over, which should be around the middle of next week. I'll
let you know. However, if you'd like to add one of your lists to the
test today, we can certainly do that. So far the staff lists seem to be
running fine and messages tagged as spam are being sent only to the
owner of the list.
Thanks for your patience.
- Luigi
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Howard Frazier wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> We have been working on the problem. Relief is expected within
> a couple of days. Please refer to the following message in
> the SEC reflector archive for the details:
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg03697.html
>
> Howard
>
> Geoff Thompson wrote:
>
> > Folks-
> >
> > Enclosed is an example, with date stamps, of a message to an 802
> > reflector that I received today. Please note that the delivery delay
was
> > only a half an our short of ONE FULL WEEK!
> >
> > If this were a single instance occurrence it would be, perhaps,
> > excusable but this has been going on for an extended length of time.
My
> > records show first e-mails on the topic over 9 weeks ago.
> >
> > It is obvious that this is not acceptable and that an e-mail system
that
> > performs at this level can not be considered to be meeting the
> > reasonable expectations that IEEE members have for conducting
business
> > by e-mail. In this case, the meeting in question had been scheduled
for
> > Tuesday, April 29, the day before the message finally arrived.
> >
> > Please advise us on what we can do to remedy this situation or how
you
> > are prepared to bring IEEE mail service to an acceptable and useful
> > level. It is my belief that if you can not provide a satisfactory
> > response then we will have no choice but to make other arrangements.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Geoff Thompson
> > SB Member, Vice Chair, IEEE 802
> >
> >
> >> Received: from zcars0ms.ca.nortel.com ([47.129.242.180]) by
> >> zsc3c028.us.nortel.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> >> Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
> >> id 2R1CKHW5; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:58:29 -0700
> >> Received: from ecarshhh.nortelnetworks.com
> >> (ecarshhh.nortelnetworks.com [47.248.0.32])
> >> by zcars0ms.ca.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with
> >> SMTP id h3UGwL117976;
> >> Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
> >> Received: from ruebert.ieee.org (ruebert.ieee.org [140.98.193.10])
by
> >> ecarshhh.nortelnetworks.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Wed, 30
Apr
> >> 2003 12:54:10 -0400
> >> Received: (from daemon@localhost)
> >> by ruebert.ieee.org (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.6) id
h3NI0oK19370
> >> for stds-802-3-pwrviamdi-resent; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:00:59
> >> -0400 (EDT)
> >> Message-Id:
<4.2.0.58.20030423100433.035baf10@zsc3c026.us.nortel.com>
> >> X-Sender: gthompso@zsc3c026.us.nortel.com
> >> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
> >> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:29:40 -0700
> >> To: "Goldis, Moty (Moty)" <mgoldis@avaya.com>
> >> From: "Thompson, Geoff
[SC100:321:EXCH]"<gthompso@americasm06.nt.com>
> >> Subject: [802.3af] Re: Hotel in the area for 28/4/03
> >> Cc: "Thompson, Geoff
[SC100:321:EXCH]"<gthompso@americasm06.nt.com>,
> >> stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@ieee.org
> >> In-Reply-To:
<AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0385DD5A@is0004avexu1.glob
> >> al.avaya.com>
> >> Mime-Version: 1.0
> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >> boundary="=====================_8109320==_.ALT"
> >> Sender: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@majordomo.ieee.org
> >> Precedence: bulk
> >> X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients
<stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@majordomo.ieee.org>
> >> X-Listname: stds-802-3-pwrviamdi
> >> X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majordomo@majordomo.ieee.org
> >> X-Moderator-Address:
stds-802-3-pwrviamdi-approval@majordomo.ieee.org
> >> X-SMTP-HELO: ruebert.ieee.org
> >> X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@majordomo.ieee.org
> >> X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: [DELETED]
> >> X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: ruebert.ieee.org [140.98.193.10]
> >>
> >> Moty-
> >>
> >> Regarding hotels near the (potential) meeting site, both the:
> >>
> >> Hilton Santa Clara (new, about 1 year old) 4949
Great
> >> American Parkway Santa Clara, CA
> >>
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> The Westin Santa Clara 5101 Great America Pkwy Santa Clara, CA
> >>
> >>
> >> are within easy walking distance (between 5 & 8 minutes) of Nortel
> >> (they are immediately north at the corner of Tasman & Gt America).
> >> Both of them are also immediately adjacent to a streetcar stop to
take
> >> you to either downtown San Jose or downtown Mountain View. I know
the
> >> Hilton has a free airport shuttle. The Westin doesn't seem to.
> >>
> >> Also within walking distance to the south is:
> >>
> >> Santa Clara Marriott (free airport shuttle to/from San Jose)
> >> 2700 Mission College Boulevard (at the corner of Great America
> >> Parkway) Santa Clara, CA 95054
> >>
> >> Phone: 408 988 1500 Fax: 408 727 4353 Web:
www.marriotthotels.com
> >> <http://www.marriotthotels.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> Holiday Inn (free airport shuttle to/from San Jose) 4200
GREAT
> >> AMERICA PARKWAY SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-1210 UNITED STATES
> >> Toll-Free: 1800-5865691 Tel: 1-408-2358900 Fax: 1-408-9880976
> >>
> >> After these four you pretty much will need a car unless you come
from
> >> some less obvious and more distant hotel and take public transit.
> >> There are an enormous number of hotels in the area that service
both
> >> the business needs of Silicon Valley and the recreational travelers
to
> >> Great America Amusement Park (next door to us). Of the 3 above I
would
> >> say they all are typical business grade hotels and you should pick
> >> from them based on what sort of web deal you can get. The Holiday
Inn
> >> caters to a more recreational crowd.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps.
> >>
> >> Geoff
> >>
> >> At 02:10 PM 4/22/2003 +0300, Goldis, Moty (Moty) wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Geoff,
> >>>
> >>> Can you please recommend on hotel near the meeting location?
> >>> Enjoy some pictures from the plug fest.
> >>>
> >>> Regards ,
> >>> Mordechai
> >>> ___________
> >>>
> >>> Mordechai Goldis
> >>> 972-3-6458425
> >>
> >
> >
> > |=========================================|
> >
> > | Geoffrey O. Thompson |
> >
> > | Vice Chair, IEEE 802 |
> >
> > | Nortel Networks, Inc. M/S: P79/06/B04 |
> >
> > | 4655 Great America Parkway |
> >
> > | P. O. Box 58185 |
> >
> > | Santa Clara, CA 95052-8185 USA |
> >
> > | Phone: +1 408 495 1339 |
> >
> > | Fax: +1 408 495 5615 |
> >
> > | E-Mail: thompson@ieee.org |
> >
> > | Please see the IEEE 802 web page at |
> >
> > | http://www.ieee802.org/
> >
>
>