Re: [802SEC] +++802 EC Motion+++ P802.16-REVd to Sponsor Ballot (Conditional Approval) CLOSES FEB 7 2004
In a message dated 1/28/2004 6:44:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, email@example.com writes:
> Dear EC members,
> This is a 10 day 802 EC email ballot to make a determination on the below EC
> That the LMSC executive committee grant Conditional Approval, under
> Procedure 10, to send P802.16-REVd to Sponsor Ballot. (see the below email
> from Roger for
> Moved by : Roger Marks
> Seconded by: Stuart Kerry
> The email ballot opens on Wednesday January 28 NOON EST and closes February
> 7 NOON EST
> Please direct your responses to the EC reflector with a CC directly to me
> - Paul Nikolich
> Chairman, IEEE 802 LMSC
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger B. Marks" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 4:47 PM
> Subject: [802SEC] request for motion: P802.16-REVd to Sponsor Ballot
> (Conditional Approval)
> > Dear Paul,
> > As I discussed during the ad hoc EC meeting of 12 January, I would
> > like to move to seek Conditional Approval, under Procedure 10, to
> > send P802.16-REVd to Sponsor Ballot. Mr. Kerry has agreed to second
> > the motion. I request that the ballot close by February 7.
> > Please note the following points:
> > (1) The Working Group Letter Ballot on sending the document to
> > Sponsor Ballot ran from 29 September to 31 October 2003. The recirc
> > ran from 6-29 December 2003. In all, we received 663 comments,
> > resolving them at our meetings in November and January.
> > (2) Ballot resolution efforts have been substantially completed. The
> > current ballot results are detailed here:
> > http://ieee802.org/16/tgd/ballot13/report13.html
> > In particular, the Approval Ratio is 93.9% [46/3/1] and the Return
> > Ratio is 87.7%. Three Disapprove voters remain. However, one of them
> > said 'I can confirm that all my technical binding comments are now
> > satisfied. In addition I will be in a position to change my vote to
> > "Approve" subject of course, to satisfactory implementation of the
> > resolutions.'
> > (3) Three Disapprove comments remain. These are posted here:
> > http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_04.pdf
> > Two of these (#27 and #613) are from the same voter and on the same
> > topic; the first has already been rejected and recirculated, and the
> > second has been rejected and is being recirculated. The third (#629)
> > is a followup to his earlier recirculated comment; it has been
> > partially accepted (although not to the voter's satisfaction) and is
> > being recirculated.
> > The full comment database is available in Commentary format here:
> > http://ieee802.org/16/docs/03/80216-03_51r10.zip
> > I'll be happy to provide this in a different format if you like.
> > (4) The draft is posted as P802.16-REVd/D3:
> > http://ieee802.org/16/private/drafts/tgd/P80216-REVd_D3.zip
> > I'll be happy to assist you if the password protection gets in your way.
> > Note that, as suggested by Mr. Thompson, the draft includes the
> > statement "This draft is intended for IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot with
> > individuals as the ballot group members."
> > (5) A 15-day confirmation ballot is currently underway. The
> > announcement is here:
> > http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_03.pdf
> > (6) At its Closing Plenary of 15 January, the 802.16 Working Group
> > approved a motion "To request conditional approval from the 802 EC to
> > forward the final balloted P802.16-REVd draft for Sponsor Ballot."
> > The motion passed by a vote of 34/0/0. Note that the
> Working Group
> > has 64 members.
> > Regards,
> > Roger