Paul,
Since it takes multiple sessions to establish (and loose)
membership. By tracking how many individuals are within one meeting of
gaining (or losing) membership, we probably could build a fairly accurate
filter for one meeting out! Just a guess.
Mat
Matthew Sherman,
PhD
Senior Member Technical
Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
Dear WG and TAG chairs,
I now have all the membership data. The
summary information is as follows:
| Working Group |
Number Voters |
|
|
| 802.1 |
50 |
| 802.3 |
182 |
| 802.11 |
507 |
| 802.15 |
261 |
| 802.16 |
149 |
| 802.17 |
38 |
| 802.18 |
20 |
| 802.19 |
12 |
| 802.20 |
189 |
| 802.21 |
49 |
TOTAL
1457
It is interesting to note that the total
membership is close to the actual number of plenary session attendees.
There is little correlation, I think, since many attendees do not ever
become members, and some attendees are members of multiple groups.
Hmmm. Maybe 'Membership" is a good long term averaging filter that is
a good predictor of plenary session attendance. I would be interested
to hear your opinions.
Now that we have the current data, I'm curious
as to what you think will happen to the number of your voters versus
time. If any of you are willing to estimate your voting
membership size for each plenary through the November 2005, send it to
me and I collect that information and we could use it as another estimate
tool for our plenary session attendance.
Regards,
--Paul
---------- This email is
sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is
maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the
802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.