Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Voting Rules
Mike,
I guess I need some background on this. During my time in IEEE
802 I have always understood that the Chair does not vote unless it
changes the outcome. Is this more of a tradition than a rule? Maybe it
is a rule in some working groups and not others. Anyone else have
information of whether the individual working groups have rules that
differ from the 802 rules? Maybe that is where I picked it up from.
Also, I checked Roberts Rules and it states that the chair only
votes
1) On ballots
2) If the chair's vote will change the result of the vote.
I now feel like a real member of the EC now that I am quoting
Roberts Rules :)
Comments?
Regards,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Takefman [mailto:tak@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 3:34 AM
To: Shellhammer, Stephen J
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Voting Rules
I disagree with Steve on this one, a WG chair has
always been able to vote at meetings on all issues
unless otherwise amended by WG rules.
Personally, I refuse to be disinfranchised from
making technical decisions at meetings.
mike
Shellhammer, Stephen J wrote:
> Matt,
>
>
>
> I vote Disapprove.
>
>
>
> My comments
>
>
>
> Procedural matters put by the Chair to the group may be decided by a
> majority vote.
>
>
>
> This is vague. Procedure matters are either decided by a
> majority or not. Saying it ?may? be decided by majority implies that
> the chair can choose between 75% and a majority. The text should read
> ?Procedural matters put by the Chair to the group are decided by a
majority?
>
>
>
> The Working Group Chair may vote at meetings.
>
>
>
> This implies that the Chair can vote on any matter during
a
> meeting. It is my impression that the rules typically only allow the
> Chair to vote if the Chair?s vote changes the outcome of the vote. I
> believe that the rules should read in that manner. I believe the 802
> Chair voting rules are that way.
>
>
>
> Numerical vote tallies must be taken on all matters that
> will be brought before the EC.
>
>
>
> Good. I like that.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
> *Sent:* Friday, January 07, 2005 9:02 PM
> *To:* STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> *Subject:* [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Voting Rules
>
>
>
> Dear EC members,
>
> Attached you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision ballot on WG
> Voting Rules. This ballot was approved at the Friday November 19, 2004
> EC meeting. The text is identical to that presented at the meeting.
The
> purpose and rationale for the ballot are as given in the attached
ballot
> document.
>
> Ballot Duration: 1/8/2005 - 2/8/2005 @ 11:59 PM EST
>
> WG/TAG chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your
> groups, and invite them to comment through you.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Mat
>
> <<802.0-WG_Voting_Rules-P&P_Revision_ballot.pdf>>
>
> Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
>
> Senior Member Technical Staff
>
> BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
>
> Office: +1 973.633.6344
>
> email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
> ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email
is
> sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is
> maintained by Listserv.
--
Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.