Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] March EC Agenda Item

As I mentioned to you earlier, I think it is always important that a 
PAR form be approved by the WG, as a technical decision.

It is my understanding that your PAR Extension Form was created after 
the WG's interim session. Therefore, I think it would be prudent to 
have the specific form approved by the WG at this Plenary Session 
before it is reviewed by the EC on Friday.


>Per Bob's request, I have posted the PAR Extension Request at:
>The form has been updated per comments from Jodi Haasz.
>Jerry Upton
>In a message dated 2/5/2006 10:01:06 AM Central Standard Time, Jerry1upton
>It is not posted. My apology for not knowing the customary approach for an
>extension request.
>I will post the PAR Extension Form early next week and send a note to the EC
>reflector. I am waiting for some additional comments from Jodi and then I will
>post a revised version.
>Jerry Upton
>In a message dated 2/5/2006 7:34:07 AM Central Standard Time,
> writes:
>It is customary to supply a URL for the PAR to decrease bandwidth in
>announcement to our WGs.  Is it posted on the 802.20 site?
>--Bob Grow
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jerry1upton@AOL.COM [mailto:Jerry1upton@AOL.COM]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 3:38 PM
>Subject: [802SEC] March EC Agenda Item
>Please add this PAR Extension request to the EC agenda for the March
>Attached is my Motion requesting approval and the completed PAR
>Form provide by SA.
>EC Members,
>Please send me any comments or questions.
>Jerry Upton

This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.