Re: [802SEC] RE: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later than 25SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC SC6 recommendation
Andrew,
Thanks for spending the time with me to discuss the
presentation.
After talking with you I am changing my vote to YES.
Regards,
Steve
P.S. No worries :)
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Myles (amyles)
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:04 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] RE: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later
than 25SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC SC6 recommendation
G'day Carl,
I responded to Geoff's suggestions with a new version (attached). Geoff
has not yet confirmed it, but I believe his comments have now been
resolved (I hope so anyway). Do you the modifications satisfy you?
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Carl R. Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, 21 September 2006 8:03 AM
To: 'Geoff Thompson'; STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] RE: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later than
25SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC SC6 recommendation
Colleagues,
Sorry ... But upon reviewing Geoff's comments I have to agree with the
points he makes (some of which I hadn't viewed in the same light until
Geoff's comments.
Therefore, I feel that I have to change my previous approve to
DISAPPROVE.
If Geoff's comments are satisfied I will change my vote back to approve.
I would have responded to Geoff's comments sooner, but for the time
offset here in Australia.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 4:10 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later than
25SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC SC6 recommendation
Paul/Colleagues-
I have to join Carl and recommend that these slides be DISAPPROVED
Please examine these points carefully. I believe they are worthy of
consideration
The text, early on (slide 4) says:
- . 8802-1 should be modified so that international
standardisation can always be achieved ...
...which (were there an appropriate WTO case and were I supporting the
"other" side) I would take as evidence for presentation to the judging
body: "Here, the IEEE even admits that they are NOT a lower case
international standard unless they are blessed by ISO/IEC.
I do not think we want to say that
I do not think that is the case
I think is not an appropriate position for 802 to take wrt the position
that the IEEE-SA takes for its standards.
Slide 7 statements open a Pandora's box of issues that might well be
nurturing to a relationship with SC6.
Slide 9, last bullet
Change:
A potential benefit for 802 of a cooperative relationship with ISO/IEC
is that it provides 802 WG's with the option of establishing
"international standard" status for an 802.x standard through ISO/IEC
using a simple documented cooperation process.
To:
A potential benefit for 802 of a cooperative relationship with ISO/IEC
is that it provides 802 WG's with the option of widening "international
standard" recognition for an 802.x standard through ISO/IEC using a
simple documented cooperation process
Slide 11:
The title:
"8802-1 should be modified so that international standardisation can
always be achieved ..."
should be changed per my critique of slide 4 above.
I support slides 12 through 21
Please carefully consider these items and reconsider your vote
Sincerely,
Geoff Thompson
At 04:23 PM 9/19/2006 , Paul Nikolich wrote:
>Dear EC Members,
>
>A revised version of the IEEE 802 recommendation on the 8802-1 and
>related documents requested by SC6 is attached for EC approval.
>
>Motion: The 802 LMSC EC resolves to adopt the attached SC6
>recommendation version 07 dated 19SEP06 (appropriately edited to remove
>the "DRAFT" and "Change History" text.)
>
>Moved-Tony Jeffree Seconded-Mat Sherman
>
>Please cast your vote as soon as possible. The ballot closes the
>earlier of either 25 Sept 2006 or 24 hours after every EC member has
>cast a
vote.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul Nikolich
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.