| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Mat, Attached is the slide capturing which draft standards may be considered for forwarding to sponsor ballot under the conditional approval criteria. Regards, --Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)" <matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM> To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:21 PM Subject: [802SEC] Review of Conditional Approval for RevCom Folks, I asked for an agenda item on this at the EC meeting this morning, but removed it due to time constraints. As I recall at the last Friday EC meeting, there was a lot of time spent reviewing material relating to Conditional Approval of Draft Standard submittals to RevCom. I would say that we did not allocate sufficient time on the agenda for those issues and that it jeopardized our ability to complete other items on the agenda. I didn't catch how many conditional approvals we are expecting this time (Paul could you comment?). Formally, the P&P reads on review of conditional approvals: Agenda Items and motions requesting conditional approval to forward when the prior ballot has closed shall be accompanied by: * Date the ballot closed * Vote tally including Approve, Disapprove and Abstain votes * Comments that support the remaining disapprove votes and Working Group responses. * Schedule for recirculation ballot and resolution meeting. The time consuming part seems to be the review of comments. While these documents need to be available at the time of the motion, nothing says they should not be available prior to the motion. Can I suggest that anyone planning to apply this procedure make at least the comment database relevant to the motion available more than a day in advance, and those who plan to examine the data bases in detail try and do so prior to the closing EC meeting and only bring forward those specific comments of concern to them? Finally I would suggest that we try and set some finite limits on discussion time for such agenda items and that if we can't complete the review in a timely fashion that the question be called or tabled? Do people have any comments concerning these suggestions? Thanks, Mat Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. Engineering Fellow BAE Systems - Network Systems (NS) Office: +1 973.633.6344 Cell: +1 973.229.9520 email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
draft stds to SB dot00_JUL_2007-Nikolich.pdf