Re: [802SEC] Electronic Participation in Interim Meetings
Geoff
I wholeheartedly agree.
The question should read "Would you participate electronically if you were
required to register for meeting and pay the normal fee as any participant."
Bob
At 07:13 PM 1/10/2009 -0800, Geoff Thompson wrote:
Mat-
At 05:56 PM 1/10/2009 , Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
> Would you participate electronically if you were required
> to pay the incremental costs for providing electronic
> participation? (Yes / No)
Such a system would not be fair to those who show up at the meeting. I see
no reason why those who show up should not should their fair share of the
overhead of putting on a meeting. That means, in my mind, that they pay
full registration fee less any portion of that which is for local food and
beverage.
When we are putting on a mixed meeting, it has significant overhead costs
that remote attendees should share in. If folks start opting for remote
participation over "being there" because they aren't supporting the cost
of putting on the meeting, then it increasingly will drive the cost of
that onto those who bother to come. I believe that we want the bias (if
any) to be in favor of getting together physically, not against.
Geoff
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1874 - Release
Date: 1/4/2009 4:32 PM
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1874 - Release
Date: 1/4/2009 4:32 PM
Bob Heile, Ph.D
Chairman, ZigBee Alliance
Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
11 Robert Toner Blvd
Suite 5-301
North Attleboro, MA 02763 USA
Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
email: bheile@ieee.org
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.