Re: [802SEC] +++EC 5 Day Review+++802.18 Comments on FCC Smart Grid Notice
Roger,
I look forward to your editorials. Bear in mind though that last week we intentionally used the same format as was used for the response earlier to the FCC regarding the definition of broadband. Since that format was previously understood then it seemed that it would be useful to use it again this time. If this form of response was confusing it would have been best to have had that input from 802.16 last week during the Hawaii meeting. Likewise for any differences regarding the content.
Hopefully this will not prevent 802.18 from filing comments on Friday. I do not think that this is something that we should remain silent on.
Regards,
Mike
+1.972.814.4901
From: Roger Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 16:17
To: MJLynch@mjlallc.com
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; dot16
Subject: Fwd: [802SEC] +++EC 5 Day Review+++802.18 Comments on FCC Smart Grid Notice
Mike,
I'll have some editorial comments. I'm also forwarding to the 802.16 reflector to seek other input.
I do want to make one point now. The response says " for clarity, we repeat the Commission's questions." That's fine, but I think you need to distinguish the questions from the answers. You can, for instance, italicize the questions. Blending the questions with the answers is pretty confusing.
Roger
Begin forwarded message:
From: "MJLynch@mjlallc.com<mailto:MJLynch@mjlallc.com>" <MJLynch@MJLALLC.COM<mailto:MJLynch@MJLALLC.COM>>
Date: 27 September 2009 11:46:47 AM MDT
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC 5 Day Review+++802.18 Comments on FCC Smart Grid Notice
Reply-To: "MJLynch@mjlallc.com<mailto:MJLynch@mjlallc.com>" <MJLynch@MJLALLC.COM<mailto:MJLynch@MJLALLC.COM>>
Dear EC,
On 4 September the FCC issued a notice calling for responses to their questions regarding the implementation of Smart Grid technology. This is related to the ongoing FCC work on the nationwide broadband proposal.. The response time was somewhat better than the previous item that 802 responded to but the timeframe was too short to allow a thorough response.
During last week's wireless interim 802.18, in conjunction with other WGs, developed a response. That document (18-09-0105-05) is available at:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/documents
The FCC due date for the comments is 2 October.
Also available as 18-09-0104-00 is the FCC notice.
This document is being sent to you for the five day review process.
I am proposing that the EC review period begins now and closes on 1 October and the 802.18 response will be filed on 2 October.
Regards,
Mike
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.