Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings
I just want to add you can close things out when you receive sufficient response. So potentially you could accomplish the vote very rapidly (a day) if members of the EC cooperate....
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Engineering Fellow
BAE Systems - Electronics, Intelligence & Support (EI&S)
Office: +1 973.633.6344
Cell: +1 973.229.9520
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:02 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings
Paul,
One way to deal with this is to hold a non-voting meeting where we discuss motions and then to have a post-meeting electronic ballot, on each motion. So the discussion could take place during the call. We could even have a straw poll and it there is controversy discuss what the controversy is.
The main issue is the overhead of having the electronic ballot. Maybe a simple spreadsheet could be used to combine all the motions onto a single spreadsheet and people could just enter their votes. It is more overhead but it would be helpful to the WGs on motions to go to Sponsor ballot and RevCom. We might end up with less conditional motions to go to Sponsor ballot and RevCom since WGs would not have to wait 4 months.
I believe this works with the current rules.
Comments?
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:34 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings
Paul,
I don't think 2 quite covers the response I gave. My points were
-- we already have continuous processing available via email votes except for submittal of PARs to NesCom.
PARs to NesCom should continue to be an action taken only at plenaries
(except perhaps for corrigenda)
email is best for continuous processing of approval to go to sponsor ballot or RevCom
-- therefore, I don't support having an interim EC meeting for these, but I could see one to deal with the topics and coordination that get short shrift during a busy plenary
Regards,
Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:04 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings
All,
So far the responses generally fall into two categories:
1) good idea, need to work out details, go for it
(Apurva, Buzz, Steve, Bruce, Jon, JohnH, Subir, Mike)
2) not a bad idea, have concerns, proceed with caution
(Pat, Mat, Tony, James, Geoff, JohnL, David)
Any further opinions? A few people (BobH, Roger, Mark) have yet to weigh
in.
Regards,
--Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:19 AM
> Subject: [802SEC] straw poll on interim EC telecon meetings
>
>
> Dear EC members,
>
> I'd like to get your feedback on holding an EC meeting via teleconference
> between plenary sessions (for example in the 1st week of June, October and
> February). My though is we'd hold a 2 hour telecon to make decisions on
> time-critical items such as PAR approvals, Sponsor Ballot initiation
> approvals, RevCom submissions, etc.
>
> I'd make sure we'd have an agenda posted 30 days in advance an all the
> materials necessary to make such decisions available for review at least
> one week before the telecon.
>
> Thoughts? Please provide your feedback by 23APR. I'll summarize the
> feedback and if the response is positive, I'd like us to consider holding
> the first such meeting 1pm-3pm ET Friday 04JUN2010.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.