Re: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot: P802.16m to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) +++
Roger
Approve
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org>
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Mon May 17 18:06:51 2010
Subject: Re: +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot: P802.16m to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) +++
Pat,
Thanks for your timely vote. I'm confident that the Conditional Approval procedure has been followed. The full ballot details are here:
<http://ieee802.org/16/ballots/ballot31>.
Roger
On 2010/05/18, at 04:17 AM, Pat Thaler wrote:
> Nancy's questions aren't mine, but for completeness, it might be best to add an explanation about the 5th no voter and the voter's name to the report. There are times when a disapprove voter wants to see their comments implemented in the draft before changing their vote. I understand that and don't think there is anything underhanded going on here. Doing what I suggest would avoid the appearance that one might be trying to hide information.
>
> I vote Approve on the motion.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nancy Bravin [mailto:nbravin@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 6:41 AM
> To: Roger B.Marks
> Cc: Pat Thaler; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot: P802.16m to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) +++
>
> Hi Roger,
> I realize that I am not a member of the EC, however I am a member of IEEE, SA, 15, and 20, and I am in the voting pool of 16. I do not understand if the 5th voter
> continues to be counted as DIsapprove with comments, why you are not putting his name with the other 4 as asked. The perception of hiding a name, whether he
> agrees later or not, seems to be in order now. I would like to know who that person is. Thank you, Nancy
>
> On May 14, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Roger B. Marks wrote:
>
>> Pat,
>>
>> You are a keen observer.
>>
>> Regarding the fifth Disapprove voter: He was satisfied with the resolution of all of his comments. However, he is not ready to give up his Disapprove status due to concerns about resolutions of other comments. We are counting him as Disapprove with comments.
>>
>> Roger
>>
>>
>> On 2010/05/15, at 02:15 AM, Pat Thaler wrote:
>>
>>> Roger,
>>>
>>> The ballot tally says that there are 5 disapprove with comment votes and 15 outstanding comments, but looking at the attached comments, I only count 4 names: Joerg S, Scott P, Peretz F, Maximilian R, on the 15 comments. Are someone's comments missing?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pat
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
>>> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:49 AM
>>> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>> Subject: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot: P802.16m to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) +++
>>>
>>> To: 802 EC
>>> cc: 802.16 Reflector
>>>
>>> Colleagues,
>>>
>>> Paul has authorized me to issue the following motion for your consideration.
>>>
>>> Motion: To grant conditional approval, per the IEEE 802 Operations Manual, to forward P802.16m for Sponsor Ballot.
>>>
>>> Moved: Roger Marks
>>> Seconded: Subir Das
>>>
>>> Start of ballot: Friday 14 May 2010, 10:00 ET
>>> Close of ballot: Monday 24 May 2010, 12:00 ET
>>>
>>> Early close: Not requested.
>>>
>>> Information:
>>>
>>> (1) I have provided all the supporting material in document IEEE 802.16-10/0037r1 <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/#10_0037>. The summary results from WG Letter Ballot are as follows:
>>> Approve: 291 (98.3%)
>>> Disapprove with comments: 5
>>> Abstain: 5
>>>
>>> (2) I know that many of you are busy with interim sessions this week, and I'm sorry to bother you with this. However, I am fully confident that conditional approval is justified, and we have a window of opportunity to run Sponsor Ballot prior to the July Plenary.
>>>
>>> (3) Please recall that I notified the EC at our last meeting (19 March) of my intent to bring this 10-day ballot. We agreed that it would be OK to proceed with it.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your time and consideration!
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.