Re: [802SEC] +++ EC vote on IEEE P802.3az RevCom submittal
Approve
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Law, David
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:52 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: +++ EC vote on IEEE P802.3az RevCom submittal
Dear EC members,
Further to the email below the IEEE P802.3az Energy-efficient Ethernet 3rd sponsor recirculation ballot closed at 11:59PM on 29th August with no new negatives. The summary ballot results are as follows:
127 voters
103 affirmative votes
1 negative votes with comments
0 negative votes without comments
6 abstention votes
86% returned
5% abstention
99% affirmative
We received only one comment - it was an editorial coordination comment that reads 'This draft meets all editorial requirements'.
I have provided the full results in the attached file.
Based on the above, and since I didn't request conditional approval in July, Paul has delegated to me the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on the motion below.
Motion
======
The EC approves the IEEE P802.3az submittal remaining on the September 2010 RevCom agenda.
Move: David Law
Second: Bruce Kraemer
Start of ballot: Thursday 2nd September Close of ballot: Sunday 12th September, 11:59PM AOE
Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2.2 'Electronic Balloting' of the IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly decide a matter.
Best regards,
David Law
Paul Nikolich wrote:
> Dear EC members,
>
> Per out process which states a WG Chair may submit a draft to RevCom
> without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies
> the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the
> complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the
> submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'.
>
> David Law has requested I review the status of the 802.3az project in
> preparation for RevCom review. I have determined there is a
> reasonable expectation the attached submittal will be approved by the
> EC before the next RevCom meeting and, via this email, am notifying the EC as such.
> See the details below.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Law, David" <dlaw@hp.com>
> To: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:12 PM
> Subject: RE: IEEE P802.3az submittal to RevCom
>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> The 2nd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az/D3.2 closed with the
> following results:
>
> 96 affirmative votes
> 5 negative votes with comments
> 0 negative votes without comments
> 6 abstention votes
>
> 84% returned
> 5% abstention
> 95% affirmative
>
> A total of 5 comments were submitted but three of them were withdrawn
> prior to the comment resolution meeting. The meeting took place on
> Thursday 12th August and no changes were made to the IEEE
> P802.3az/D3.2 draft. The two remaining comments however are unresolved
> and as they are associated with a negative vote require recirculation.
>
> The 3rd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az opened on Friday 13th
> August and will close on Sunday 29th August. Based on the email
> exchange below I would like to proceed to submit IEEE P802.3az to
> RevCom in order to meet the 20th August submittal deadline. Once the
> recirculation is complete I will perform an EC email ballot to confirm
> that the submittal package remain on the September RevCom agenda.
>
> The process outlined in Clause 14 states I may submit to RevCom
> without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies
> the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the
> complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the
> submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'.
> I have therefore attached the complete RevCom package I propose to submit.
>
> Since the scope of the current 3rd recirculation is limited to two
> unresolved comments I hope that you agree with me that when the 3rd
> recirculation ballot closes and I perform the EC email ballot the
> submittal will be approved by the EC.
>
> Best regards,
> David
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.