Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++ EC vote on IEEE P802.3az RevCom submittal



David

I vote approve.

James Gilb

Law, David wrote:
Dear EC members,

Further to the email below the IEEE P802.3az Energy-efficient Ethernet 3rd sponsor recirculation ballot closed at 11:59PM on 29th August with no new negatives. The summary ballot results are as follows:

127 voters
103 affirmative votes
1   negative votes with comments
0   negative votes without comments
6   abstention votes

86% returned
5%  abstention
99% affirmative

We received only one comment - it was an editorial coordination comment that reads 'This draft meets all editorial requirements'.
I have provided the full results in the attached file.

Based on the above, and since I didn't request conditional approval in July, Paul has delegated to me the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on the motion below.


Motion
======

The EC approves the IEEE P802.3az submittal remaining on the September 2010 RevCom agenda.

Move:    David Law
Second:  Bruce Kraemer

Start of ballot: Thursday 2nd September Close of ballot: Sunday 12th September, 11:59PM AOE

Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2.2 'Electronic Balloting' of the IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly decide a matter.

Best regards,
  David Law



Paul Nikolich wrote:
Dear EC members,

Per out process which states a WG Chair may submit a draft to RevCom without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'.

David Law has requested I review the status of the 802.3az project in preparation for RevCom review. I have determined there is a reasonable expectation the attached submittal will be approved by the EC before the next RevCom meeting and, via this email, am notifying the EC as such.
See the details below.

Regards,

--Paul


----- Original Message ----- From: "Law, David" <dlaw@hp.com>
To: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: IEEE P802.3az submittal to RevCom


Hi Paul,

The 2nd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az/D3.2 closed with the following results:

96 affirmative votes
5 negative votes with comments
0 negative votes without comments
6 abstention votes

84% returned
5% abstention
95% affirmative

A total of 5 comments were submitted but three of them were withdrawn prior to the comment resolution meeting. The meeting took place on Thursday 12th August and no changes were made to the IEEE P802.3az/D3.2 draft. The two remaining comments however are unresolved and as they are associated with a negative vote require recirculation.

The 3rd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az opened on Friday 13th August and will close on Sunday 29th August. Based on the email exchange below I would like to proceed to submit IEEE P802.3az to RevCom in order to meet the 20th August submittal deadline. Once the recirculation is complete I will perform an EC email ballot to confirm that the submittal package remain on the September RevCom agenda.

The process outlined in Clause 14 states I may submit to RevCom without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'. I have therefore attached the complete RevCom package I propose to submit.

Since the scope of the current 3rd recirculation is limited to two unresolved comments I hope that you agree with me that when the 3rd recirculation ballot closes and I perform the EC email ballot the submittal will be approved by the EC.

Best regards,
 David
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.