| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Bruce, 1.
ISO SC 6 and not ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC6? 2.
The information should also be sent to the IETF new-work reflector when the proposed PARs are posted 30 days before a plenary – that’s what they care most about though they will probably also appreciate
getting the after plenary follow-up. 3.
Agree 4.
IETF handles this through a new-work reflector which doesn’t require or support cover letters. It should be possible to write the draft email once and just fill in the blanks each time.
From: Bruce Kraemer [mailto:bkraemer@marvell.com]
Pat, 1.
The additional group requesting this information is ISO SC6. 2.
I would support the motion proposed by John as a vehicle for making info available at the end of each plenary. In addition….. 3.
We have a standardized system for collecting and displaying PAR information on a PAR page so I presume, with a little bit of work, we can replicate that for Study Groups. 4.
Conveyances to ISO will need to be formatted i.e the new information from each plenary dropped into a cover letter. I expect each recipient will require a similar procedure. I believe each of these
cover letters, and email distribution lists, can be prepared once and then reused by John after each plenary. Bruce From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Pat Thaler Does anyone object to the motion John suggests? Pat From: John D'Ambrosia
[mailto:jdambrosia@force10labs.com]
Pat, I assume you are going to want the recording secretary, i.e. me, to send this. As I would be sending this as the IEEE 802 LMSC Recording Secretary, I would prefer a motion supporting that communication. However, I do not think it needs to be a liaison, and believe that the following would
be sufficient Move that the IEEE 802 LMSC Recording Secretary send an informal communication to external groups, as designated by the IEEE 802 EC Chair, that communicates for each IEEE 802 Plenary Session PARs and Study Groups
that were under consideration. John From:
owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Pat Thaler We discussed during the EC teleconference whether posting a pointer to PARs on the IETF new-work reflector is a liaison statement which requires a motion or not. Some felt strongly that it does and others equally strongly that it doesn’t.
We have a similar request from another standards body (was it ITU?). The form of email would be something like: The following Project Authorization Requests are under consideration for the <month> <year> IEEE 802 Plenary: A list of <designation>-<title> The PARs can be found at
http://ieee802.org/PARs.shtml. Any comments on a proposed PAR should be sent to the Working Group chair identified in the PAR to be received by <date of Tuesday of the plenary> 1700 <time zone of meeting>. At this point, I can see two courses of action – A motion to give blanket approval to a regular liaison mailing of the information above to IETF (and possibly include the other body) Or A motion to acknowledge that the above communication is not a formal liaison and doesn’t require approval. I’d like input on which would be preferred. Pat ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|