| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
James,
I like.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James P. K. Gilb
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:47 PM
To: 802 EC
Subject: [802SEC] Proposed 5C
All
Based on the feedback from John D'Ambrosia, I worked out another proposal for the 5C (including the updated compatibility escape clause proposed by Ben Rolfe).
The idea is as follows:
14 CSD and 5C
14.1 Project process requirements
(ongoing work in the project)
14.1.1 Managed objects
14.1.2 Coexistence
(requirement is limited to wireless projects)
14.2 5C (no expansion, just 5C)
(bar to pass to get PAR approved)
14.2.1 Broad market potential
14.2.2 Compatibility
14.2.3 Distinct Identity
14.2.4 Technical Feasibility
14.2.5 Economic Feasibility
This keeps the market value of 5C, allows us to add more (5C doesn't mean 5 criteria) and keeps the process items separate from the pass the bar items.
It has been posted to:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/13/ec-13-0009-03-00EC-proposed-5c.pdf
James Gilb
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.