Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
John, Thanks for the reminder. Historically 802 has opposed FCC receiver rules, saying rather that the standards should take care of that. It may be good just to discuss
to make certain that is still the agreed view. Best regards, Mike From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of John H Notor FYI, We did not respond to the initial request for comment. If there is any interest, we still can, even as late as the July Plenary. Released: 06/10/2013. OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY EXTENDS COMMENT PERIOD FOR TECHNOLOGICAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (TAC) WHITE PAPER
AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING RECEIVER PERFORMANCE. (DA No. 13-1344). (Dkt No 13-101 ). Comments Due: 07/22/2013. Reply Comments Due: 08/07/2013. OET . Contact: Robert Pavlak at (202) 418-0761, email: Robert.Pavlak@fcc.gov or
Ronald Repasi at (202) 418-0768, email: Ronald.Repasi@fcc.gov http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1344A1.docx John
John Notor ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|