[802SEC] Fwd: 802.11 PAR Review SC Report to 802.11 WG

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Thanks for the responses.

802.11 has two outstanding issues with the responses.

See 11-15/1212r3 <https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1212-03-0PAR-par-review-agenda-and-meeting-slides-november-2015.pptx>

From the file:

802.15.4t PAR 2.1

802.11 Rebuttal: The requirement is to put the range where it “first appears”, so either put the range in the title, or change the title to not require the use of “High(er)”.

802.16s:- PAR 7.1

802.11 Rebuttal: NB-IOT is of similar scope and has similar use cases in the same band. Therefore, it should be identified in 7.1. However, we recognize that the identified stakeholders appear to have a need for an 802.16 based solution, and the competing solution may not meet their needs. We suggest you include this information in 7.1 because it explains why this amendment to 802.16 may be justified.

Regards,

Jon

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl             Engineer, Senior Staff
CSR Technology Inc. - A Qualcomm company
cell:801-376-6435         10871 North 5750 West
office: 801-492-4023      Highland, UT 84003

A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jon Rosdahl <jrosdahl@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:47 AM
Subject: 802.11 PAR Review SC Report to 802.11 WG
To: "STDS-802-11@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <STDS-802-11@listserv.ieee.org>

I have posted the 802.11 PAR Review SC report to the working group in doc: 11-15/1212r3
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1212-03-0PAR-par-review-agenda-and-meeting-slides-november-2015.pptx

The minutes were posted in doc: 11-15/1213r0:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1213-00-0PAR-par-review-meeting-minutes-november-2015.docx

Regards,

Jon Rosdahl

802 PAR Review Chair