[802SEC] Comments on 802.15.4v PAR and 802.15.12
Bob
802.15.4v
PAR comments:
5.2
- What are the anticipated data rates and ranges? Without the target
data rates and ranges it is not possible to determine the technical
feasibility of the proposed amendment.
- 802.15.4 has many PHYs, will all of them be re-mapped into these
bands or just specific ones.
I think the easiest thing here is to reference the PHYs in the standard
that be enabled to use the indicated bands. This would resolve range
and rate questions as the PHYs have already been shown to have technical
feasibility for their intended ranges and rates.
I don't think the WG is intending that all 20 some PHYs are mapped into
these bands.
CSD comments:
No comments
802.15.12
PAR comments:
5.2: The Scope references EtherType as a protocol differentiation. To
be more precise and to align with IEEE 802-2014, I suggest changing
"EtherType" to be "EtherType Protocol Differentiation (EPD)" and add a
note to 8.1 that EPD is defined in IEEE 802-2014 (including the full
name of the standard to avoid NesCom comments).
6.1.b: What registration is anticipated with regards to this proposed
standards? EtherTypes already exist and so I don't see that this adds
any new registration activity. When we use MAC addresses in the
standard, we don't mention that there is a registration activity
associated with them because it is not a new activity.
CSD comments:
General: A similar comment about using just "EtherType" which is a
number and EPD, which is a function/protocol. I would suggest using EPD
instead.
Thanks
James Gilb
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.