Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++10 day ECM+++ ITU-R Contribution on Light Communications

Pat et al:

 

My job is to shepherd this document through the process and get it submitted. With late comments, with no time to discuss further, I have no option but to incorporate all the comments in the documents as presented, unless the original author has objections.

 

Rich Kennedy

 

Director, Global Spectrum Strategy

HPE logo

 

Board Director, Dynamic Spectrum Alliance

Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group

Chair Emeritus, IEEE 802.11af WLAN in TVWS

Chair, Wi-Fi Alliance Spectrum & Regulatory Task Group

 

rich.kennedy@hpe.com

(737) 202-7014

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:15 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++10 day ECM+++ ITU-R Contribution on Light Communications

 

I agree that if there is an error in a reference to our draft that we should correct it.

 

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Roger Marks <r.b.marks@ieee.org> wrote:

I agree with James on all counts (though I don't know what to do with "IMC", except to add a note that it should be expanded).

 

We are providing a markup of the ITU draft in order to show our proposed corrections. As members, we are as responsible as anyone else to improve the draft, so we should correct errors. If the error is in a reference to our standard, then we for sure need to correct it.


Regards,

 

Roger


On May 29, 2017, 7:39 PM -0400, Geoff Thompson <thompson@ieee.org>, wrote:

Rich-

James-

 

RE:

Page 7: I think the reference for 802.15.7 should be:

 

IEEE Std 802.15.7-2011, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks--Part 15.7: Short-Range Wireless Optical Communication Using Visible Light

 

(also, no quotes around the title when referring to it earlier) This is the original ITU-R text, to which we are adding our edits. It would not be appropriate for us to change.

 

My opinion is that the original ITU-R text should be quoted intact in liaison letters.

If the title of one of our standards is quoted incorrectly then a "(sic)" should be inserted to indicate that it is not correct.

If that is done then the liaison text that we provide should explain the error and provide the correct form of theme of the title being referenced.

 

Geoff

 

 

On May 29, 2017, at 6:28 AMPDT, Kennedy, Rich <rich.kennedy@HPE.COM> wrote:

 

James:

 

While preparing to send this document to our ITU-R Liaison I discovered that some of your edits are not appropriate. See the embedded notes.

 

Thank you.

 

Rich Kennedy

 

Director, Global Spectrum Strategy

 

 

Board Director, Dynamic Spectrum Alliance

Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group

Chair Emeritus, IEEE 802.11af WLAN in TVWS

Chair, Wi-Fi Alliance Spectrum & Regulatory Task Group

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: James Gilb [mailto:Gilb_IEEE@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:45 PM
To: Kennedy, Rich <rich.kennedy@hpe.com>; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++10 day ECM+++ ITU-R Contribution on Light Communications

 

Rich

 

I vote approve with the following editorial suggestions:

 

"1 Mbps" should be "1 Mb/s" according to SI-10 (three locations on page 5) This is the original ITU-R text, to which we are adding our edits. It would not be appropriate for us to change.

 

"IMC" on page 5 is used, but the acronym has not been previously expanded. This is the original ITU-R text, to which we are adding our edits. It would not be appropriate for us to change.

 

Page 6: "backhauling" is likely not a word.  I would think "backhaul"

would be appropriate in this location. This is the original ITU-R text, to which we are adding our edits. It would not be appropriate for us to change.

 

Page 7: I think the reference for 802.15.7 should be:

 

IEEE Std 802.15.7-2011, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks--Part 15.7: Short-Range Wireless Optical Communication Using Visible Light

 

(also, no quotes around the title when referring to it earlier) This is the original ITU-R text, to which we are adding our edits. It would not be appropriate for us to change.

 

Page 7: Bibliography item [7] is a repeat of item [3].  I don't think you need both, so I would suggest deleting [7]. Deleted.

 

James Gilb

 

On 05/22/2017 10:21 AM, Kennedy, Rich wrote:

> Dear EC Members:

> 

> It appears that I neglected to add this phrase: With this e-mail, I'd like to announce the start of the ballot.

> 

> 

> Dear EC Members:

> 

> Last week at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Daejeon, we approved a contribution to ITU-R towards a PRELIMINARY Draft New Report ITU-R SM.[Visible-Light]. It was created by Nikola Serafimovski, and edited (in great detail) by Roger Marks.

> 

> This needs to be voted by the EC and transmitted by May 30th. Please review. I would like to start the ballot this week

> 

> Paul has delegated the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on the following motion to me.

> MOTION: To approve, under the "Procedure for communication with

> government bodies," the release to ITU-R Working Party 1A of the

> content of the draft contribution in 

> I am the mover, and Roger Marks has offered to second.

> 

> 

> Documents:

> ribution-to-itu-r-wp-1a-comment-on-working-document-towards-a-prelimin

> ary-draft-new-report-itu-r-sm-visible-light.docx

> sion-of-itu-r-wp-1a-comment-on-working-document-towards-a-preliminary-

> draft-new-report-itu-r-sm-visible-light.docx

> 

> Thank you.

> 

> Rich Kennedy

> 

> Director, Global Spectrum Strategy

> [HPE logo]<http://www.hpe.com/>

> 

> Board Director, Dynamic Spectrum Alliance Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio

> Regulatory Technical Advisory Group Chair Emeritus, IEEE 802.11af WLAN

> in TVWS Chair, Wi-Fi Alliance Spectrum & Regulatory Task Group

> 

> 

> 

> ----------

> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

> 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.