Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] how to answer the PAR question on Purpose



Jon,

Sorry to be slow about this, but I'm still not sure how to answer in the example I gave.

I think the answer is No or Yes, depending on whether "this document" is the amendment (which has no purpose clause) or the amended standard (which retains the unamended one).

Cheers,

Roger
On Feb 9, 2020, 21:58 -0700, Jon Rosdahl <jrosdahl@ieee.org>, wrote:
The Purpose clause is the one on the standard. An Amendment Par that is changing the Purpose statement could do so here. 
The scope statement was split to an "a" and "b" so that the amendment PAR could have a scope of the amendment and be able to update the scope of the draft itself if needed.

FWIW,
Jon

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl                 Engineer, Senior Staff
office: 801-492-4023      Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
cell:   801-376-6435      10871 North 5750 West
                                   Highland, UT 84003

A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!

Sent from BlueMail
On Feb 9, 2020, at 7:20 PM, Roger Marks <r.b.marks@ieee.org> wrote:
I have question for the NesCom experts. I have trouble understanding the PAR submission instructions regarding Purpose:

5.4 Will this document contain a purpose clause?A purpose statement is encouraged but not mandatory.
A paragraph describing the purpose of the standard is not mandatory in the draft. However, if included, the purpose of the standard and its intended application shall be included in a separate subclause (1.2). The purpose shall explain why the standards project is needed.
If the document will not include a purpose statement choose "No" and leave the purpose field blank. 
The Purpose stated on the PAR shall be written in present tense, in complete sentences, and with proper grammar as it is intended to appear in the published standard. The title and (if appropriate) date of any document referenced in the Purpose shall be listed in the Additional Explanatory Notes field at the end of this PAR form.
Take the case in which the PAR is for an amendment of a standard that already contains a Purpose statement and the intention is to leave the Purpose unamended. Then I can understand the highlighted sentence two ways:

(1) If “this document” means “the amended standard”, then the answer should be “Yes”.
(2) If “this document” means “the amendment”, then the answer should be “No”.

Which is the correct understanding? Also, is this understanding apparent from the instructions? 

Cheers,

Roger

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1