[802SEC] New epoll regarding OM
- To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
- Subject: [802SEC] New epoll regarding OM
- From: "James P. K. Gilb" <000008e8b69871c2-dmarc-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:33:21 -0700
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=kkJ7BGyk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gilb_ieee@yahoo.com designates 98.137.65.58 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gilb_ieee@yahoo.com
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=references:content-transfer-encoding:content-language:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from:to:dkim-signature; bh=60tXM7eG3rGd8wUsAc5667I8ITZ8wvcH07VxlfE6Ezg=; b=DdBsOEHjAtluSkYMW5nolY04CfVP7nSPbOH0Ys8iPaQEByxcBZgbCKzzUxwjOf8hYb FW5Odix48gID/5zC6Jk89bghYDtMKktCx9SQ+YrwrjVpw4Oi59xJgBGfVkvFuzHz5Br9 zW/LVgtHvkaMo3J+nGSILAeCJRK00sPsc+3x9gPwEbYWF6TT8sTyCsJmYx7RZnCIXCE3 hvwmDaKRLX/ADlaX36toun1QkUo9dUBjtfkMlJ2kGIrVKg8P9tzkMKQ4oGRZVKuLbbST aKNAGaZdHL6B47LdyXoiIZADN0lMxM9/zZsQcF0x2uPyZ8V12pq1tz4SbeCt0/iCKAcJ vfzA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587594930; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e0Q2HmRKp4SGAkF+6HnjEZZZF+KlIdVRx+zL/a4YDvFu4trYJryIk0o8oWNWrR1NIp Nj55U145dNAS5QnJNgap4mHQ9cMWgtHsqjvRBWa5T/KQ1qXbTfJrJbzRFH/bnf1Wwr+r tO7JCwxHCtnlXbsUmdg8NVNNYB1Y6vLcGeLm4qSIyNZJDJcYeKpIkzyotYwhsLOQpQvB EdB1yOrz9tSlmkfgl8YI67j6j6YWiFD4MChEcgr8R8fP+OEpiPVMgLaSRX8Ac5wOr3c7 Qtx5kAndGlNqYRzZjvZZ2AKGQ/vvxuNH1pAAJgc5D4gsrXMWYb+4FrmmulcgACGIipeC dD0g==
- Delivered-to: mhonarc@GROUPER.IEEE.ORG
- Delivered-to: stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 emlpav01.ieee.org 03MMZd7V012822
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=mail; t=1587594939; bh=nT746EU+w+UdXl9pixZxCj1KdOOcv2L2paIAuOvDg3w=; h=References:Date:Reply-To:From:Subject:To:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Owner:From; b=dRFR9tNRNVAOrO6I9N66jmqVoW/dEXEV2fdN+YwCjSR0TFh0+PxMiQg+kabFjkPeL fy2vhY53xbIRhtyASbTdmIRNK2hTtUUm77x7A0E5rHQxqPUu7WRfufCyKGQ8TTW5pO 7uFy9LxAAXCKKvzLfCwWstRgtZqbmirReA3SUPlw=
- List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-SEC>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-SEC>
- List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-SEC-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-SEC-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-SEC-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- References: <88296d9e-0029-723c-8665-459eef2c7e9b.ref@yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: "James P. K. Gilb" <Gilb_IEEE@YAHOO.COM>
- Sender: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
There is new epoll on proposed additions to the OM.
https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/polls?ack=1058
I would request that all EC members respond to the epoll by the closing,
next Tuesday so we can discuss the results on the Wednesday call.
The location of the proposed text in the OM has not yet been decided, I
would like at this time to determine the direction of the LMSC and then
work towards final wording and location.
Background: Recognizing that we cannot predict the next unpredictable
event that makes it not possible to carry out IEEE 802 LMSC business in
the ordinary manner, it is proposed that we add text that allows
suspension or modification of an OM rule in the case of "extraordinary
external circumstances"
We have not achieved consensus in a few areas, which are the subject of
the epoll:
1) Should we include an explicit maximum time for which any suspension
could be valid?
Note:
- The motion would still have to state a time and rationale (or the
LMSC would spend a lot of time complaining about the wording of the
motion). The additional text in the OM would place an upper limit on
the duration of the suspension that could be requested in the motion.
2. Should we allow the IEEE 802 LMSC Chair to suspend the OM, unless it
is objected to by any IEEE 802 LMSC voting member?
The discussion on this takes two flavors:
- The may be some circumstance in which an early close electronic
ballot cannot complete in time to respond to an exigent circumstance
that we cannot predict at this time.
- An LMSC early close ballot can complete in less than 1 hour, but
even 24 hours is sufficient for these sorts of decisions.
3. If the LMSC Chair is allowed to suspend the OM, what is the upper
limit of the time duration for such suspension?
There are three options presented, check out the epoll for more
information or ask on the reflector.
James Gilb
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.