|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
There is the feeling among many that active participation in ballots
(i.e., reading and providing actionable comments) from a wide variety of
technical individuals is an important part of the standards development
However, it appears that the active participation we get in ballots is
only a small fraction of the potential pool of participants who would be
able to provide quality comments and proposed solutions (which includes
ones for which the group might disagree).
I am forming an ad-hoc to brainstorm ideas with which we might encourage
broader participation in our balloting process.
An example of a proposals is:
- Request that individuals read and focus on specific section (and can
read more), ensuring that each section has multiple requested reviewers.
I hope that we come up with a variety of ideas as it is likely that one
"solution" won't fit all (they rarely do).
Please respond to me if you would like to join this ad-hoc or if you
have any ideas.
You don't need to attend any meeting to suggest an idea or complain
about an idea we develop.
We are a volunteer organization, so these methods should focus on
encouragement and not rely on enforcement.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1