Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi George,
I explained that to the WG, so they understood that point.
Regards,
Steve
From: George Zimmerman <george@cmephyconsulting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 8:16 AM To: Steve Shellhammer <sshellha@QTI.QUALCOMM.COM>; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: RE: Proposed rule change for in person attendance requirement. WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. We took care of grandfathering in the text defining in-person attendance. Anything prior to march 31 (virtual or in-person) counts as in-person.
4.1 Attendance at Meetings, insert at end of section:
“In-person Credited Attendance is Credited Attendance for an on-site individual at the meeting venue, and Credited Attendance earned prior to March 31, 2024 shall be the same as In-person Credited Attendance.”
“In-person Session Attendance Credit is Session Attendance Credit consisting entirely of In-person Credited Attendance, and Session Attendance Credit earned prior to March 31, 2024 shall count as In-person Credited Attendance for the purpose of establishing or retaining membership.”
George Zimmerman, Ph.D. President & Principal CME Consulting, Inc. Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications 310-920-3860
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
On Behalf Of Steve Shellhammer
Hi James and George,
We also discussed this topic in 802.19.
Concerns were raised about the timing since there is an ongoing contraction in Tech market.
It was suggested we do a straw poll and share the results with you.
Below are the straw poll results.
Regards, Steve ----------------- Straw Poll
What is the earliest this rule should become effectively?
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
on behalf of Chad Jones (cmjones) <00000b60b3f54e8d-dmarc-request@listserv.ieee.org>
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Ben does acknowledge one hole in the proposal (that I don’t think I’ve seen covered). Do we have a rule in place about grandfathering? It will be a limited case, but I suspect there will be some who are in process of gaining voting rights. That means that this Plenary (or the Jan Interim) was their first meeting that counts toward voting rights. They need another Plenary to gain voting rights. Would this second one be required to be in person? I would advocate that we grant voting rights based on the CURRENT rules while also starting the clock on required in person attendance to maintain these rights. This would mean that if they attend the July Plenary virtually, they will gain voting rights. But if they do not attend at least two in person by July ’25, they would lose those rights.
Regards,
Chad Jones Principal Engineer, Cisco Systems Executive Secretary, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Chair, IEEE P802.3da Task Force Principal, NFPA 70 CMP3
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 |