Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - 2.4GHz inclusion



Igal,

If people agree, no problem to include 2.4GHz.

For this band we should consider powers according to the
 FCC NPRM (FCC-03-223). Can you input the "System parameters"?

Regards,

Marianna

-----Original Message-----
From: Yigal Leiba [mailto:yigall@runcom.co.il]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:08 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - First working document and questions


Hi  Marianna,

I would propose to include 2.4GHz in the study, because
although it is a noisy band, it has very good propagation and
better mobility than 5.8GHz.

Best Regards,
Yigal

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Marianna Goldhammer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 8:56 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - First working document and questions


Hi All,

I started the work by looking at System Parameters:

- for Tx power and antenna gain, I used data sheets of
  existing products, from some 5 companies; took the
   most used ones

- for SCa, OFDM,OFDMA, I used D3  to get
  performance parameters.

In the attached document you will find a proposal for
system parameters, some questions, a list of main
 interference scenarios to look at, and in the Annex
 relevant extracts from D3.

Please:

- comment on proposed parameters
- address the "yellow text" and provide OFDM and OFDMA
  parameters for lowest rate ACI
- comment on scenarios
- propose how to evaluate "service disruption" cases.

Regards,

Marianna

IEEE 802.16 LE Ad-Hoc Chair

P.S. Feel free to insert comments in text

 <<C802.16-04_NNr0.doc>>


This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com

****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********


This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com

****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com

************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************