Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT NOW !!!)

To: "Roger B. Marks" <marks@boulder.nist.gov>
Subject: Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT NOW !!!)
From: Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:56:30 +0000
Cc: stds-802-sec@ieee.org, "802 @F2F Dawn S" <dawns@facetoface-events.com>, "802 @F2F Darcel Moro" <dmoro@attcanada.ca>, "Caroline R. Armstrong" <carmstrong@imag.net>, "Kesling, Dawson W" <dawson.w.kesling@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <p04310104b64ad3985d54@[10.0.0.3]>
References: < <7971F8E10FC92A4A8843153152E62CF901C0D0EB@xch-nw-12.ca.boeing.com><7971F8E10FC92A4A8843153152E62CF901C0D0EB@xch-nw-12.ca.boeing.com>
Sender: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org


At 08:51 29/11/00 -0700, Roger B. Marks wrote:
>Buzz,
>
>Option #2 is fine with me.
>
>However, I don't feel comfortable choosing between Option #2 and Option 
>#1. If 802.3 wants to come to Orlando too, I am happy to share. If they 
>prefer Sacramento, that's fine too. I wouldn't want to see Option #2 win 
>your poll if 802.3 supports Option #1, or vice versa.
>
>Roger

Buzz -

I agree with Roger - the choice between #1 and #2 is down to the 802.3 
guys, so I am happy to go with Geoff's call on this.

Regards,
Tony

References:
- URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT NOW !!!)
  - From: "Rigsbee, Everett O" <Everett.Rigsbee@PSS.Boeing.com>
- Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DOIT NOW !!!)
  - From: "Roger B. Marks" <marks@boulder.nist.gov>

Prev by Date: RE: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT NOW !!!)
Next by Date: Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DOIT NOW !!!)
Prev by thread: Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DOIT NOW !!!)
Next by thread: Re: URGENT - We Need an Instantaneous Response. (That means DO IT NOW !!!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread