Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Matt,
Only NON_HT_DUP_OFDM packets. Basically, we can do "inside" clause 23 what VHT can do "inside" clause 22 (i.e. transmit NON_HT_DUP_OFDM according to clause
22.3.10.12 and proper VHT)
Best Regards
Jens
Jens TINGLEFF Consultant, Analogue/RF IC Design
Phone: +44 (0)1223 692076 Mobile: +33 (0)6 86 64 86 72 Fax: +33 (0)4 89 73 70 01 From: *** 802.11 TGaf - TV White Spaces OperationTask Group *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew Fischer Sent: 17 July 2012 17:53 To: STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU What about a non-HT PPDU – VHT STA can transmit these things, but TVHT STA does not transmit them, right? Do we need a blanket statement somewhere at the top of clause 9 or something? Matthew Fischer From: Ron Porat
I think the latter. TVHT is a VHT. From: *** 802.11 TGaf - TV White Spaces OperationTask Group *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Matthew Fischer Is there a TVHT PPDU? Do we need to change, in clause 9, occurrences of VHT PPDU to “VHT PPDU or TVHT PPDU”? Or do we assume that occurrence of VHT PPDU are sufficient to describe behavior for a TVHT STA, since a TVHT STA is a VHT STA? Matthew Fischer To report this email as spam click here. Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom More information can be found at www.csr.com. Follow CSR on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CSR_PLC and read our blog at www.csr.com/blog |