Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU

Don’t we want to use non-HT PPDU for ACKs?

 

From: *** 802.11 TGaf - TV White Spaces OperationTask Group *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:53 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU

 

 

What about a non-HT PPDU – VHT STA can transmit these things, but TVHT STA does not transmit them, right?

Do we need a blanket statement somewhere at the top of clause 9 or something?

 

Matthew Fischer

 

From: Ron Porat
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:02 PM
To: Matthew Fischer; STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Draft treatment of VHT PPDU

 

I think the latter. TVHT is a VHT.

 

From: *** 802.11 TGaf - TV White Spaces OperationTask Group *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:45 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU

 

 

Is there a TVHT PPDU?

 

Do we need to change, in clause 9, occurrences of VHT PPDU to “VHT PPDU or TVHT PPDU”?

 

Or do we assume that occurrence of VHT PPDU are sufficient to describe behavior for a TVHT STA, since a TVHT STA is a VHT STA?

 

 

 

Matthew Fischer