Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi All: Here is my part of Comment Resolution against Section 10.3. Two documents are uploaded: 11-15-0031-00-00: The Spreadsheet of the comments
11-15-0032-00-00: The comment resolution proposal document. Thanks Rob From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Fangping (Device Standard) Hi Marc and all, Just finished reviewing D3.1. Ping Fang -- Motion 153 and Motion 164 and Motion 169 Motion 153 and 169 are OK, a submission is provided for missing change from Motion 164 Ping, please look additionally at the following comments as requested by Lee: Red are the rejected comments (check if justification is sufficient), blue needs someone to look into it (for instance a "revised" resolution but without an indication of what to change from the proposed) 6951, 6040, 6041, 6455, 6367, , 6977, 6003, 6483, , 6272, 6405, 6881, , 6136, 6011, , 6885, ,
6514, , 6722, , 6359, ,
, 6180, , 6317, , 6630, 6827, 6680, A submission is provided for resolution cleanup to some of the CIDs Thanks, Ping Fang From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marc Emmelmann All, Lee as implemented all comment resolutions that were approved at the last face-to-face meeting. the resulting TGai D3.1 is available in the membership are: http://www.ieee802.org/11/private/Draft_Standards/11ai/index.html I have also uploaded a new revision of the comment resolution spreadsheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1351-18-00ai-tgai-lb204-comments-for-draft-3-0.xlsx Note: I have included a tab "Comment from ALL ballots" in case you need reference to CIDs / resolutions from previous ballots We will start as before a review process to allow the submitters of comment resolutions to review the implementation of the resolutions. Of course, anyone is welcome to provide feedback as part of the review process, but in addition, I would like to suggest the following persons to take a lead in reviewing the implementation. Please provide your feedback in form of a submission to mentor (choose the format that best suits you) and announce your submission to the TGai reflector. We would appreciate your feedback by Jan 6th, 2015. Best, Marc P.S.: Finally, for your convenience, the summary of who provided which resolutions and should hence have a look at the corresponding resolutions. The assignment is based on choosing the "mover" for motions passed in San Antonio. Please refer to the motion deck (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1186-13-00ai-tgai-motion-deck.pptx) or the minutes (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1558-00-00ai-november-2014-san-antonio-session-minutes.doc)
for details on the CIDs to review. Santosh Abraham -- Motion 142 Yunsong Yang -- Motion #143 and Motion 144 and Motion 166 and Motion 170 Hitoshi Morioka -- Motion 145 and Motion 160 and Motion 167 Jeongki Kim -- Motion 146 and 146a and Motion 147 & 147a and Motion 148 & 148a and Motion 165 (attn.: check minutes for Wed PM2 motions to reconsider were passed and original motions were amended) George Calcev -- Motion 149 and Motion 159 Jouni Malinen -- Motion 150 and Motion 174 Xiaofei Wang -- Motion 151 and Motion 155 Rob Sun -- Motion 152 and Motion 168 and Motion 171 and Motion 172 Santosh Pandey -- Motion 154 Jarkko Kneckt -- Motion 156 and Motion 157 and Motion 161 Jae Seung Lee -- Motion 158 Marc Emmelmann -- Motion 173 Ping Fang -- Motion 153 and Motion 164 and Motion 169 Ping, please look additionally at the following comments as requested by Lee: Red are the rejected comments (check if justification is sufficient), blue needs someone to look into it (for instance a "revised" resolution but without an indication of what to change from the proposed)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |