Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] TGai D3.1 available -- review of implementation o

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hello Rob,

Thanks for these resolutions, and my apologies for not finding the time

to review them when you sent them to me earlier this week. Here are

my comments on some of them:

CID	Page	Line	Clause	Comment	Proposed Change	Resolution	Ad-hoc Notes
6766	88.00	1	10.3.2	Assuming DMG STAs can do FILS, then there needs to be an arrow from State 2 to State 5 saying "Successful FILS authentication" and the arrow from State 5 to State 1 needs to be duplicated to go from State 5 to State 2, with the former labelled "(non-DMG)" and the latter labelled "(DMG)"	Make the changes specified in the comment	Reject DMG STA in the DMG BSS does not utilize the IEEE 802.11 authentication frames which is not compatible with the FILS authentication scheme	This is not correct. DMG STAs can use 802.11 authentication. See 11mc/D3.0 10.3.1: State 1: Initial start state for non-DMG STAs and for DMG STAs that perform IEEE Std 802.11 authentication. State 2: Initial start state for DMG STAs that do not perform IEEE Std 802.11 authentication.
6729	88.00	1	10.3.2	What happens if a DMG STA undergoes deauthentication?	Add "3. Deauthentication (DMG STA)" to the arrow from State 4 to State 2 and to the arrow from State 3 to State 2	Reject As per IEEE 802.11ad-2012 section 11.1.3 the IEEE 802.11 deauthentication shall not be used.	802.11ad-2012 is superseded by 802.11mc/D3.0, which allows (de)authentication
6332	86.00	33	10.3	The purpose of the States in 10.3 is to define what kinds of frames may be sent when. The introduction of a State 5 is not necessary. The reference is to the encompassing subclause	Remove all references to State 5 (if there is some particular state FILS STAs need to have when authenticated but not associated, this should be covered in a different or new subclause)	Reject This State 5 is where the FILS STA to carry on the FILS authentication/association by disabling the IEEE 802.1x. Note: This is duplicated with duplicated with CID 6107 and motioned and resolved	What is the difference between State 5 and State 2?
6316	86.00	47	10.3.1	"A FILS STA that has dot11FILSImplemented equal to true and dot11FILSActivated equal to true" -- the first adjective already implies the latter two	Delete "that has dot11FILSImplemented equal to true and dot11FILSActivated equal to true"	Revised, By removing FILS in front of STA in the sentence.	I thought we had agreed to change all "STA that has dot11FILSActivated to true"s to "FILS STA"s? Note dot11FILSImplemented doesn't appear anywhere else

Regards,

Mark

Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français

Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600

Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601

ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk

From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Sun
Sent: 9 January 2015 07:18
To: STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] TGai D3.1 available -- review of implementation of comment resolutions

Hi All:

Here is my part of Comment Resolution against Section 10.3. Two documents are uploaded:

11-15-0031-00-00: The Spreadsheet of the comments

11-15-0032-00-00: The comment resolution proposal document.

Thanks

Rob

From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fangping (Device Standard)
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 4:56 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] TGai D3.1 available -- review of implementation of comment resolutions

Hi Marc and all,

Just finished reviewing D3.1.

Ping Fang -- Motion 153 and Motion 164 and Motion 169

Motion 153 and 169 are OK, a submission is provided for missing change from Motion 164

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0047-00-00ai-missing-editorial-changes-from-d3-1-review.xlsx

Ping, please look additionally at the following comments as requested by Lee:

Red are the rejected comments (check if justification is sufficient), blue needs someone to look into it (for instance a "revised" resolution but without an indication of what to change from the proposed)

6951, 6040, 6041, 6455, 6367, , 6977, 6003, 6483, , 6272, 6405, 6881, , 6136, 6011, , 6885, , 6514, , 6722, , 6359, , , 6180, , 6317, , 6630, 6827, 6680,

A submission is provided for resolution cleanup to some of the CIDs

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0049-00-00ai-resolution-cleanup-for-some-comments-to-d3-0.xlsx

Thanks,

Ping Fang

From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Emmelmann
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 8:51 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] TGai D3.1 available -- review of implementation of comment resolutions

All,

Lee as implemented all comment resolutions that were approved at the last face-to-face meeting.

the resulting TGai D3.1 is available in the membership are: http://www.ieee802.org/11/private/Draft_Standards/11ai/index.html

I have also uploaded a new revision of the comment resolution spreadsheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1351-18-00ai-tgai-lb204-comments-for-draft-3-0.xlsx

Note: I have included a tab "Comment from ALL ballots" in case you need reference to CIDs / resolutions from previous ballots

We will start as before a review process to allow the submitters of comment resolutions

to review the implementation of the resolutions.

Of course, anyone is welcome to provide feedback as part of the review process, but in addition,

I would like to suggest the following persons to take a lead in reviewing the implementation.

Please provide your feedback in form of a submission to mentor (choose the format that best suits you)

and announce your submission to the TGai reflector.

We would appreciate your feedback by Jan 6th, 2015.

Best,

Marc

P.S.: Finally, for your convenience, the summary of who provided which resolutions and should hence

have a look at the corresponding resolutions. The assignment is based on choosing the "mover"

for motions passed in San Antonio. Please refer to the motion deck (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1186-13-00ai-tgai-motion-deck.pptx)

or the minutes (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1558-00-00ai-november-2014-san-antonio-session-minutes.doc) for details on the CIDs to review.

Santosh Abraham -- Motion 142

Yunsong Yang -- Motion #143 and Motion 144 and Motion 166 and Motion 170

Hitoshi Morioka -- Motion 145 and Motion 160 and Motion 167

Jeongki Kim -- Motion 146 and 146a and Motion 147 & 147a and Motion 148 & 148a and Motion 165 (attn.: check minutes for Wed PM2 motions to reconsider were passed and original motions were amended)

George Calcev -- Motion 149 and Motion 159

Jouni Malinen -- Motion 150 and Motion 174

Xiaofei Wang -- Motion 151 and Motion 155

Rob Sun -- Motion 152 and Motion 168 and Motion 171 and Motion 172

Santosh Pandey -- Motion 154

Jarkko Kneckt -- Motion 156 and Motion 157 and Motion 161

Jae Seung Lee -- Motion 158

Marc Emmelmann -- Motion 173

Ping Fang -- Motion 153 and Motion 164 and Motion 169

Ping, please look additionally at the following comments as requested by Lee:

6951, 6040, 6041, 6455, 6367, , 6977, 6003, 6483, , 6272, 6405, 6881, , 6136, 6011, , 6885, , 6514, , 6722, , 6359, , , 6180, , 6317, , 6630, 6827, 6680,

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Emmelmann
e-mail: emmelmann@xxxxxxxx web: http://www.emmelmann.org

IEEE 802.11 TGai Vice-Chair

Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user=_EfkmxcAAAAJ

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.