Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Unassigned Comments

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:36 PM Stacey, Robert <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Zhou,

I have assigned you: 16605, 15679, 15718

The 3 were previously assigned.

comments

CID

LB

Commenter(E)

Vote

Type of Comment T/E(C)

Page

Clause

Duplicate of CID

Resn Status

Comment

Proposed Change

Resolution

Owning Ad-hoc

Comment Group

Ad-hoc Status

Ad-hoc Notes

Assignee

16921

233.00

Tomoko Adachi

T

277.55

27.5.1.1

"An AP shall not transmit an HE MU PPDU of DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA allocated in an RU that is addressed to a STA unless the AP has received from the STA ..." Here, "a STA" should be "STAs", as multiple STAs are always transmitted in DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA. If it is to a single STA, then it don't have to be in DL MU-MIMO...

Change it to read "An AP shall not transmit an HE MU PPDU of DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA allocated in an RU that is addressed to STAs unless the AP has received from each of the STAs ...".

EDITOR

Tomoko Adachi

16605

233.00

Pooya Monajemi

T

278.20

27.5.1.1

This language belongs to a PHY section

Move to clause 28

EDITOR

Zhou Lan

16128

233.00

Mark RISON

T

278.24

27.5.1.2

"If an RU is intended for an AP, then the STA_ID_LIST contains only one element that is set to the 11 LSBs of the AID of the non-AP STA transmitting the PPDU." contradicts other statements like "Each element of the TXVECTOR parameter STA_ID_LIST identifies the STA or group of STAs that is the recipient of an RU in the HE MU PPDU." in 27.11.1 and "for an HE MU PPDU and indicates the STA or group of STAs that is the recipient of an RU" in 8.3.5.2.2 and " The STA-ID field in each User field indicates the intended recipient user of the corresponding spatial streams and the RU." in 28.3.2.5

Add caveats of the form "except when sent to an AP" to the referenced locations. Also add text in 27.5.1.2 to describe the setting ot the STA-ID field from a non-AP STA

MU

MU operation

Abhishek Patil

15944

233.00

Mark Hamilton

T

278.35

27.5.1.2

A receiving non-AP STA can't possibly know what the AP set in its TXVECTOR parameter to its PHY.

Change the wording to reference over-the-air signalling that the non-AP STA can receive, that gives it this indication. Same in the next sentence.

MU

MU operation

Abhishek Patil

15679

233.00

Huizhao Wang

T

278.51

27.5.1.3

Many restrictions in the text to restrict 26-tone RU use cases in 5G. For example: must satisfy N * 4 * 26-tone for the entire PPDU; at least 2x26-tones has to be modulated for each 20MHs subchannel. Instead of adding these restrictions, propose to eliminate 20-tone RU for 5G, restrict it to be used in 2.4G only.

as specified in Comment

EDITOR

Zhou Lan

15718

233.00

James Lepp

T

278.63

27.5.1.3

What is OBSS B? what does B refer to?

Declare what B is?

EDITOR

Zhou Lan

-Robert

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zhou Lan
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 2:44 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Unassigned Comments

Hi Osama,

I am resolving some CID in section 27.5. So may I volunteer to solve CIDs 15679, 15718, 15944, 16128, 16605 and 16921.

Many thanks

Zhou
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:50 AM Osama AboulMagd <Osama.AboulMagd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks very much Yasu.

Regards;

Osama.

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yasuhiko Inoue
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 4:07 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Unassigned Comments

Hi Osama,

I can volunteer for the following comments.

CID 15000
CID 15033, 15034, 15885, 15887
CID 15047

and maybe some more.

I will present the resolutions during the TGax ad hoc in Shenzhen.

Best regards,
Yasu

On 2018/10/16 0:00, Osama AboulMagd wrote:

Hello All,

There are about 200 comments that are not assigned to anyone (please see the attached spreadsheet). This is a real risk the TG wouldn’t be able to go to LB in November since we cannot do the blanket rejection we did before.

Please look at the attached spreadsheet and see if you can help with the resolution of these comments.

Regards;

Osama.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
-- 
Yasuhiko Inoue, Ph.D
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1

comments
CID	LB	Commenter(E)	Vote	Type of Comment T/E(C)	Page	Clause	Duplicate of CID	Resn Status	Comment	Proposed Change	Resolution	Owning Ad-hoc	Comment Group	Ad-hoc Status	Ad-hoc Notes	Assignee
16921	233.00	Tomoko Adachi		T	277.55	27.5.1.1			"An AP shall not transmit an HE MU PPDU of DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA allocated in an RU that is addressed to a STA unless the AP has received from the STA ..." Here, "a STA" should be "STAs", as multiple STAs are always transmitted in DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA. If it is to a single STA, then it don't have to be in DL MU-MIMO...	Change it to read "An AP shall not transmit an HE MU PPDU of DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA allocated in an RU that is addressed to STAs unless the AP has received from each of the STAs ...".		EDITOR				Tomoko Adachi
16605	233.00	Pooya Monajemi		T	278.20	27.5.1.1			This language belongs to a PHY section	Move to clause 28		EDITOR				Zhou Lan
16128	233.00	Mark RISON		T	278.24	27.5.1.2			"If an RU is intended for an AP, then the STA_ID_LIST contains only one element that is set to the 11 LSBs of the AID of the non-AP STA transmitting the PPDU." contradicts other statements like "Each element of the TXVECTOR parameter STA_ID_LIST identifies the STA or group of STAs that is the recipient of an RU in the HE MU PPDU." in 27.11.1 and "for an HE MU PPDU and indicates the STA or group of STAs that is the recipient of an RU" in 8.3.5.2.2 and " The STA-ID field in each User field indicates the intended recipient user of the corresponding spatial streams and the RU." in 28.3.2.5	Add caveats of the form "except when sent to an AP" to the referenced locations. Also add text in 27.5.1.2 to describe the setting ot the STA-ID field from a non-AP STA		MU	MU operation			Abhishek Patil
15944	233.00	Mark Hamilton		T	278.35	27.5.1.2			A receiving non-AP STA can't possibly know what the AP set in its TXVECTOR parameter to its PHY.	Change the wording to reference over-the-air signalling that the non-AP STA can receive, that gives it this indication. Same in the next sentence.		MU	MU operation			Abhishek Patil
15679	233.00	Huizhao Wang		T	278.51	27.5.1.3			Many restrictions in the text to restrict 26-tone RU use cases in 5G. For example: must satisfy N * 4 * 26-tone for the entire PPDU; at least 2x26-tones has to be modulated for each 20MHs subchannel. Instead of adding these restrictions, propose to eliminate 20-tone RU for 5G, restrict it to be used in 2.4G only.	as specified in Comment		EDITOR				Zhou Lan
15718	233.00	James Lepp		T	278.63	27.5.1.3			What is OBSS B? what does B refer to?	Declare what B is?		EDITOR				Zhou Lan