Hi Zhou and Robert,
I said I’ll take CID 16921 about a week ago, but Zhou, if you’re already working on it, I’ll pass it over to you!
Best regards,
tomo
From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Stacey, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 7:37 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Unassigned Comments
Hello Zhou,
I have assigned you: 16605, 15679, 15718
The 3 were previously assigned.
|
comments
|
|
CID
|
LB
|
Commenter(E)
|
Vote
|
Type of Comment T/E(C)
|
Page
|
Clause
|
Duplicate of CID
|
Resn Status
|
Comment
|
Proposed Change
|
Resolution
|
Owning Ad-hoc
|
Comment Group
|
Ad-hoc Status
|
Ad-hoc Notes
|
Assignee
|
|
16921
|
233.00
|
Tomoko Adachi
|
|
T
|
277.55
|
27.5.1.1
|
|
|
"An AP shall not transmit an HE MU PPDU of DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA allocated in an RU that is addressed to a STA unless the AP has received from the
STA ..." Here, "a STA" should be "STAs", as multiple STAs are always transmitted in DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA. If it is to a single STA, then it don't have to be in DL MU-MIMO...
|
Change it to read "An AP shall not transmit an HE MU PPDU of DL MU-MIMO within OFDMA allocated in an RU that is addressed to STAs unless the AP has received
from each of the STAs ...".
|
|
EDITOR
|
|
|
|
Tomoko Adachi
|
|
16605
|
233.00
|
Pooya Monajemi
|
|
T
|
278.20
|
27.5.1.1
|
|
|
This language belongs to a PHY section
|
Move to clause 28
|
|
EDITOR
|
|
|
|
Zhou Lan
|
|
16128
|
233.00
|
Mark RISON
|
|
T
|
278.24
|
27.5.1.2
|
|
|
"If an RU is intended for an AP, then the STA_ID_LIST contains only one element that is set to the 11 LSBs of the AID of the non-AP STA transmitting
the PPDU." contradicts other statements like "Each element of the TXVECTOR parameter STA_ID_LIST identifies the STA or group of STAs that is the recipient of an RU in the HE MU PPDU." in 27.11.1 and "for an HE MU PPDU and indicates the STA or group of STAs
that is the recipient of an RU" in 8.3.5.2.2 and " The STA-ID field in each User field indicates the intended recipient user of the corresponding spatial streams and the RU." in 28.3.2.5
|
Add caveats of the form "except when sent to an AP" to the referenced locations. Also add text in 27.5.1.2 to describe the setting ot the STA-ID field
from a non-AP STA
|
|
MU
|
MU operation
|
|
|
Abhishek Patil
|
|
15944
|
233.00
|
Mark Hamilton
|
|
T
|
278.35
|
27.5.1.2
|
|
|
A receiving non-AP STA can't possibly know what the AP set in its TXVECTOR parameter to its PHY.
|
Change the wording to reference over-the-air signalling that the non-AP STA can receive, that gives it this indication. Same in the next sentence.
|
|
MU
|
MU operation
|
|
|
Abhishek Patil
|
|
15679
|
233.00
|
Huizhao Wang
|
|
T
|
278.51
|
27.5.1.3
|
|
|
Many restrictions in the text to restrict 26-tone RU use cases in 5G. For example: must satisfy N * 4 * 26-tone for the entire PPDU; at least 2x26-tones
has to be modulated for each 20MHs subchannel. Instead of adding these restrictions, propose to eliminate 20-tone RU for 5G, restrict it to be used in 2.4G only.
|
as specified in Comment
|
|
EDITOR
|
|
|
|
Zhou Lan
|
|
15718
|
233.00
|
James Lepp
|
|
T
|
278.63
|
27.5.1.3
|
|
|
What is OBSS B? what does B refer to?
|
Declare what B is?
|
|
EDITOR
|
|
|
|
Zhou Lan
|
-Robert
From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High
Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Zhou Lan
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 2:44 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Unassigned Comments
Hi Osama,
I am resolving some CID in section 27.5. So may I volunteer to solve CIDs 15679, 15718, 15944, 16128, 16605 and 16921.
Thanks very much Yasu.
Regards;
Osama.
Hi Osama,
I can volunteer for the following comments.
CID 15000
CID 15033, 15034, 15885, 15887
CID 15047
and maybe some more.
I will present the resolutions during the TGax ad hoc in Shenzhen.
Best regards,
Yasu
On 2018/10/16 0:00, Osama AboulMagd wrote:
Hello All,
There are about 200 comments that are not assigned to anyone (please see the attached spreadsheet). This is a real risk the TG wouldn’t be able to go to LB in
November since we cannot do the blanket rejection we did before.
Please look at the attached spreadsheet and see if you can help with the resolution of these comments.
Regards;
Osama.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
--
Yasuhiko Inoue, Ph.D
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
|