Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Ok. Thanks Ross. Regards; Osama. From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Yujian (Ross Yu) Hi Mark and all, I am to run SP1. For SP2, that is not part of my CID. Maybe Lili or somebody else later can request a SP. Hi Osama, It would be good if put the contribution 497r2 back in the queue to have some discussion first, before I run the motions according to the discussion.
regards 于健 Ross Yu Huawei Technologies 发件人: *** 802.11
TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表 Mark RISON Based on the subsequent discussions on the reflector, I think we need to run the following two SPs to make progress: SP1) For 160M/80+80M, should having all the 20M subchannels in the secondary 80M channel punctured be allowed? SP2) For 160M/80+80M, should having more than two adjacent 20M subchannels punctured be allowed? Note: for 160M this includes channels adjacent between the primary and secondary 80M channels, e.g. the ---xxx-- pattern Thanks, Mark On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 18:41, Mark RISON <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |