Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hello, This week is ok for me. Thanks, Lili From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Yujian (Ross Yu) Hi all, If possible, I would like to present in this week’s CC. I am also ok to choose a time that all interested parties can participate if
there are further requests. regards 于健 Ross Yu Huawei Technologies 发件人:
*** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表 Osama Aboul-Magd Hi Lili, Yes, we can arrange it. I am not sure when Ross is presenting. Also Mark has asked to run a number of SPs. I prefer to schedule the
discussion during a time when all interested individuals are available. Regards; Osama. From:
"*** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN ***" <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Lili Hervieu <L.Hervieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hello Osama,
I have a submission,
618r0 (CID 24101), that is related to puncturing patterns and SP2. This is complementary to CID 24106 handled by Ross. It has also been briefly addressed last week while Ross presented his submission. It would be beneficial to review these CIDs in the same session. So I would like to ask if I can present
my submission right after Ross’s one. Thanks, Lili. From: *** 802.11
TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Osama AboulMagd Ok. Thanks Ross. Regards; Osama. From: *** 802.11
TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Yujian (Ross Yu) Hi Mark and all, I am to run SP1. For SP2, that is not part of my CID. Maybe Lili or somebody else later can request a SP. Hi Osama, It would be good if put the contribution 497r2 back in the queue to have some discussion first, before I run the motions
according to the discussion. regards 于健
Ross Yu Huawei Technologies 发件人:
*** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表
Mark RISON Based on the subsequent discussions on the reflector, I think we need to run the following two SPs to make progress: SP1) For 160M/80+80M, should having all the 20M subchannels in the secondary 80M channel punctured be allowed? SP2) For 160M/80+80M, should having more than two adjacent 20M subchannels punctured be allowed? Note: for 160M this includes channels adjacent between the primary and secondary 80M channels, e.g. the ---xxx-- pattern Thanks, Mark On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 18:41, Mark RISON <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |