Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Mark,
I am fine with the proposed text.
From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> CAUTION: This email
originated from outside of the organization. So, combining with the previous sentence we end up with something like: A non-AP HE STA shall determine the total number of eligible RA-RUs in a contiguous set of RA-RUs from the Number Of RA-RU subfield (see Figure 9-64f (RA-RU
Information subfield format)) in the User Info field corresponding to an eligible RA-RU, excluding RA-RUs that are not within its operating bandwidth. ? Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Liwen, Po-Kai, Mark, Thank you for the discussion on CID 24019 during this morning’s 11ax call. How about we generalized the text as follows: A non-AP HE STA shall consider subset of eligible RUs that fall within its operating BW. This will cover all cases. I noticed 27.3.2.8 (RU restrictions for 20 MHz operation) and 27.3.2.9 (RU restrictions for 80 MHz operation) specify action on the AP side. Therefore, those references may not be
appropriate. Instead 27.3.2.7 (20 MHz operating non-AP HE STAs) and 26.8.7 (HE subchannel selective transmission) would be better alternatives if someone really wants to provide any references. 26.8.7 covers 80 MHz operation. Could you please let me know if you have additional feedback or suggestions? Regards, To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |