Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Thanks Ganesh, based on your findings, I can certainly change the proposed text shown in 11-19-1455r2
The LTF Generation SAC and its associated Secure LTF Counter
(#2289) parameters are carried in an initial Fine Timing Measurement frame To: The LTF Generation SAC and its associated Secure LTF Counter
(#2289) parameters are carried in an initial Fine Timing Measurement frame And upload 11-19-1455r3 If no one objects (keep their vote as is) assuming it’s also fine with the Chair. If not, we’ll leave it as is and fix it as part of a new comment in future. Regards, Ali From: Venkatesan, Ganesh <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
the organization. Hello Ali: We had a short debate/discussion on how variant/subvariant of trigger frames defined in TGaz are refered in the draft. First off we have a Ranging variant and not a Location variant – see Table 9-25b In Clause 11.22.6.4.3.2 where we describe Polling we use, Each polling part instance includes a single (#1890) a Ranging Trigger frame of subvariant Poll
(see 9.3.1.22.9 Ranging Trigger variant). SO, I think the consistent reference to trigger frames would be “Ranging Trigger frame of subvariant {Poll, Sounding, Secure Sounding, Report, Passive} Cheers -- ganesh “It is amazing what you can accomplish if you don’t care who gets the credit.” – Harry Truman To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1 |