| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Ganesh, So currently we have: “Poll, Sounding, Secure Sounding, Report, Passive Location Sounding” So the change you are proposing is to change “Passive Location Sounding” to “Passive”? I think at the very least we should call it “Passive Sounding”, though I am thinking we might as well stick with what we have for the subvariants. I think that is more descriptive and currently I think we never refer to “Passive” on its
own. Think it is always “Passive Location Ranging”, or as here to make it a little shorter “Passive Location (Sounding)”. Erik From: *** 802.11 TGaz - NGP - Next Generation Positioning *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Venkatesan, Ganesh Hello Ali: We had a short debate/discussion on how variant/subvariant of trigger frames defined in TGaz are refered in the draft. First off we have a Ranging variant and not a Location variant – see Table 9-25b In Clause 11.22.6.4.3.2 where we describe Polling we use, Each polling part instance includes a single (#1890) a Ranging Trigger frame of subvariant Poll
(see 9.3.1.22.9 Ranging Trigger variant). SO, I think the consistent reference to trigger frames would be “Ranging Trigger frame of subvariant {Poll, Sounding, Secure Sounding, Report, Passive} Cheers -- ganesh “It is amazing what you can accomplish if you don’t care who gets the credit.” – Harry Truman To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1 |