Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] Looks like I need to make a new version of 11/20-

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Thread Links

Date Links

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] Looks like I need to make a new version of 11/20-1487r4 and fix the resolution text for CIDs 3052, 3053, and 3874

To: STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] Looks like I need to make a new version of 11/20-1487r4 and fix the resolution text for CIDs 3052, 3053, and 3874

From: Jon Rosdahl <jrosdahl@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:14:28 -0600

HI Erik,

While I understand the sentiment of the comment resolution for CID 3874 and 3053 are the same, it is best to copy the resolution from CID 3052 into the resolution boxes. Don't refer to other CIDs, but rather pull the resolution and repeat it.

Suggested Best Practices,

Jon

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jon Rosdahl                         Engineer, Senior Staff
IEEE 802 Executive Secretary Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
office: 801-492-4023                  10871 North 5750 West
cell:   801-376-6435       Highland, UT 84003

A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:02 PM Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Looks like I need to make a new version of 11/20-1487r4 and fix the resolution text for CIDs 3052, 3053, and 3874.

The resolution to 3052 does not reflect that we arrived at in our discussion. (Should be change to Primary and Secondary, as in the discussion in the document.)

Also, think I need to change the language for the resolutions for CIDs 3053 and 3874.

So let me ask for agenda time to revisit 11/20-1487 for this purpose.

Below is what is in 1487r4:

CID

P.L

Clause

Comment

Proposed change

Proposed resolution

3052

97.28

9.6.7.50

The word "Primus" and "Secundus" are new for 802.11. Do we realy need to use such new words from Latin?

Suggest to find a better word (less rare and not from Latin). Why not "First"?

Revised. Change to ‘Primus’ to ‘First’ and ‘Secundus’ to ‘Second’, with the appropriate capitalizations, throughout the draft, as directed in document 11/20-1487.

3053

99.03

9.6.7.51

The word "Primus" and "Secundus" are new for 802.11. Do we realy need to use such new words from Latin?

Suggest to find a better word (less rare and not from Latin) Why not "Second"?

This is a duplicate CID. See resolution for CID 3052.

3874

99.03

Primus and secondus could be primary and secondary - continuing existing usage in the spec

Change as suggested

This is a duplicate CID. See resolution for CID 3052.

Erik

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1

CID	P.L	Clause	Comment	Proposed change	Proposed resolution
3052	97.28	9.6.7.50	The word "Primus" and "Secundus" are new for 802.11. Do we realy need to use such new words from Latin?	Suggest to find a better word (less rare and not from Latin). Why not "First"?	Revised. Change to ‘Primus’ to ‘First’ and ‘Secundus’ to ‘Second’, with the appropriate capitalizations, throughout the draft, as directed in document 11/20-1487.
3053	99.03	9.6.7.51	The word "Primus" and "Secundus" are new for 802.11. Do we realy need to use such new words from Latin?	Suggest to find a better word (less rare and not from Latin) Why not "Second"?	This is a duplicate CID. See resolution for CID 3052.
3874	99.03		Primus and secondus could be primary and secondary - continuing existing usage in the spec	Change as suggested	This is a duplicate CID. See resolution for CID 3052.