Hi Jon,
Yes, understand. I’ll fix it in one of the upcoming submissions.
Erik
From: Jon Rosdahl [mailto:jrosdahl@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 3:14 PM
To: Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] Looks like I need to make a new version of 11/20-1487r4 and fix the resolution text for CIDs 3052, 3053, and 3874
While I understand the sentiment of the comment resolution for CID 3874 and 3053 are the same, it is best to copy the resolution from CID 3052 into the resolution boxes. Don't refer to other
CIDs, but rather pull the resolution and repeat it.
Suggested Best Practices,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl Engineer, Senior Staff
IEEE 802 Executive Secretary Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
office: 801-492-4023 10871 North 5750 West
cell: 801-376-6435 Highland, UT 84003
A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!
Hi Jonathan,
Looks like I need to make a new version of 11/20-1487r4 and fix the resolution text for CIDs 3052, 3053, and 3874.
The resolution to 3052 does not reflect that we arrived at in our discussion. (Should be change to Primary and Secondary, as in the discussion in the document.)
Also, think I need to change the language for the resolutions for CIDs 3053 and 3874.
So let me ask for agenda time to revisit 11/20-1487 for this purpose.
Below is what is in 1487r4:
CID
|
P.L
|
Clause
|
Comment
|
Proposed change
|
Proposed resolution
|
3052
|
97.28
|
9.6.7.50
|
The word "Primus" and "Secundus" are new for 802.11. Do we realy need to use such new words from Latin?
|
Suggest to find a better word (less rare and not from Latin). Why not "First"?
|
Revised. Change to ‘Primus’ to ‘First’ and ‘Secundus’ to ‘Second’, with the appropriate capitalizations, throughout the draft, as directed in document
11/20-1487.
|
3053
|
99.03
|
9.6.7.51
|
The word "Primus" and "Secundus" are new for 802.11. Do we realy need to use such new words from Latin?
|
Suggest to find a better word (less rare and not from Latin) Why not "Second"?
|
This is a duplicate CID. See resolution for CID 3052.
|
3874
|
99.03
|
|
Primus and secondus could be primary and secondary - continuing existing usage in the spec
|
Change as suggested
|
This is a duplicate CID. See resolution for CID 3052.
|
Erik
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1
|