[STDS-802-11-TGBA] TGba 11-19/749r1 needs update (TX LO)

[Minyoung Park <mpark.ieee@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Geert, Richard,

In 749r1, the CID number in the table is incorrect (it should be 2111, not 2110) and the reference in the proposed resolution needs to be updated with correct revision number. This document needs to be revised to r2. The following is what I see in r1.

CID	Clause	Page/Line	Comment	Proposed Change	Resolution
2110	31.2.12.1	106/39	Specification of maximum TX LO leakage level is said to be specified in section 21.3.17.4.2. This section states: When the RF LO is in the center of the transmitted PPDU BW, the power measured at the center of transmission BW using resolution BW 312.5 kHz shall not exceed the average power per-subcarrier of the transmitted PPDU [...]. However it is not clear which subcarrier is meant here. Is it 1. the 11a LSIG or MARK sub carrier level? 2. The subcarrier level in the sync field (6 tones present)? 3. The subcarrier level in the payload (6 or 12 tones present, depending on data rate)? 4. Another subcarrrier level (for example what is the subcarrier level in MC-OOK?)	Specify which subcarrier level is meant to limit the TX LO leakage.  I suggest to use the 11a LSIG subcarrier level. Also, add text in section 21.3.17.4.2 saying that the table is not restricted to VHT formats, but includes WUR formats as well. Add column(s) for various WUR modes, or, if applicable, specify which of the current column apply to WUR. Change explanatory text above table 21-5 to say that the table is not limited to VHT formats, but also includes WUR formats. Alternatively, add a new WUR specific table, either to section 21.3.6 in the 802.11 standard or to section 21.3.17.4.2 in the 802.11ba amendment.	Revised TGba Editor makes changes as shown in 802.11-19/0782r0

Regards,

Minyoung

   

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1