Also CID 1063 should be transferred to Morioka-san.
|
1063
|
Antonio DeLaOlivaDelgado
|
9.4.2.300.2
|
25
|
19
|
T
|
Y
|
25.00
|
19
|
9.4.2.300.2
|
Xiaofei Wang
|
The text "The Next eBCS Info frame subfield indicates the number of TBTTs until the next eBCS Info frame is transmitted. If the STA does not transmit eBCS Info frames, this subfield
is not used."indicates that the Next eBCS Info frame subfield may not be used, and the field is optional but there is no bit in the control indicating if it is present or not. Another way would be to indicate that if the element is 1 byte long then the Nexst
eBCS Info frame subfield is not present
|
As the comment indicate
|
|
From: Xiaofei Wang
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 17:23
To: Marc Emmelmann <marc.emmelmann@xxxxxx>; Hitoshi MORIOKA <hmorioka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: transfer CID 1270
Dear Marc, Morioka-san and Mark,
I think CID 1270 should be transferred to Morioka-san. I can help with wording if necessary.
|
1270
|
Mark RISON
|
9.4.2.300.2
|
25
|
19
|
T
|
Y
|
25.00
|
19
|
9.4.2.300.2
|
Xiaofei Wang
|
"number of TBTTs until" is not clear, e.g. is 0 ever used, or is it 1 to mean transmitted at the next TBTT? Also, eBCS Info frames are not generally transmitted at TBTTs, so
there is a fractional ambiguity
|
Use baseline wording for similar cases to define a number of TBTTs; augment it with something to explain how transmissions after a TBTT are accounted for
|
Revised:
The cited text has been deleted.
|
Best regards,
Xiaofei Clement Wang
Principal Engineer | InterDigital
T: (631) 622.4028
E: Xiaofei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1