Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Antonio, Thanks for providing this text proposal. I agree that this “conflict” in the draft and the resolutions need to be resolved.
Attached is a red lined and commented version of your text proposal containing my “thoughts”.
I think a bit mask approach would probably work best if the intent is to allow the negotiation methods be orthogonal and independent of each other. If the intent is that only one negotiation method can be used then a value based approach
would be preferred. Regards, Joseph From: ** STDS-802-11-TGbc -- Enhanced Broadcast Service ** <STDS-802-11-TGBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of ANTONIO DE LA OLIVA DELGADO
Dear all, new text that I hope it helps solving the issues with the Negotiation method field. Thanks Antonio -- Antonio de la Oliva To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1 |
Attachment:
11-21-0581-04-00bc-conflict-1091-1451-JL.docx
Description: 11-21-0581-04-00bc-conflict-1091-1451-JL.docx