Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Oded, Thanks for sharing. I am not a PHY guy, so I am not up-to date with the latest discussions in PHY. I have some clarification questions: For SPs 1 and 2: 1) Do we already have a definition/agreement of the term “puncturing structure”? 2) I am guessing, your assumption here is that the first 1 represents the Primary 20 MHz as the lowest (or the highest) 20 MHz channel, but it may not always be the case; P20 may also be the 2nd or the 3rd 20 MHz channel.
So I am not sure if it is correct to use such a bitmap (1001, 1010) here. Perhaps it is better to spell out that the secondary 20 MHz and either one of the 20 MHz chanel of the seconday 40 MHz may be punctured. Best Regards, Rojan From: Oded Redlich (TRC) <oded.redlich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hello PHY people, I would like to share the SPs of contribution 11-20/483 and open it for discussion via the reflector. This contribution is scheduled for the coming CC on Monday. In a nutshell, this contribution suggests to support more puncturing cases respective to 11ax in order to improve the channel utilization. Any comments or suggestions are welcome SP #1
SP #2
SP#3
BR, Oded Redlich To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |