Oh I got it.
J
Thanks Ross.
Anyway it will be better if those SP texts are available as soon as possible in public area.
Best regards,
Wook Bong Lee
From: Yujian (Ross Yu) [mailto:ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 7:06 PM
To: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 答复: Clarification on SP2 in 545r0
Hi Wook Bong,
I get the SP by requesting the detailed voting status from the PHY ad-hoc chairs.
regards
于健 Ross Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人:
Wook Bong Lee [mailto:wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2020年4月8日 10:04
收件人:
STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Clarification on SP2 in 545r0
Hi Sigurd,
Where I can find SPs?
I can’t find meeting minutes in the mentor.
Best regards,
Wook Bong Lee
From: Yujian (Ross Yu) [mailto:ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 6:47 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: Clarification on SP2 in 545r0
Thanks Sigurd. Your suggestion looks good to me.
regards
于健 Ross Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人:
Sigurd Schelstraete [mailto:sschelstraete@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2020年4月8日 9:32
收件人: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>;
tianyu@xxxxxxxxx
抄送:
STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: RE: Clarification on SP2 in 545r0
Hi Ross,
The polling tool does not allow copy/paste after the poll has been created, so I have to make changes manually if there are last-minute changes. Looks like some things were missed
in this case.
What was on the screen was:
That was the intended poll.
We can either modify the language if there are no objections are rerun the poll. We can discuss on Thursday.
Regards,
Sigurd
From: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:14 PM
To: Sigurd Schelstraete <sschelstraete@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
tianyu@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Clarification on SP2 in 545r0
[External Email]: This email arrived from an external source - Please exercise caution when opening any attachments or clicking on links.
Hi Sigurd and Tianyu,
When I read the SP results (SP5_0406.txt) requested and forwarded by my colleague, I find the text for SP5 is not exactly what was shown in your slides.
The SP 5 in the txt doc is:
1. [20/0545r0] Do you agree that the following indication should be the same considering symbol alignment within each segment from PHY point of view if the fields are present in U-SIG
- Number of EHT-SIG symbols
- GI+EHT-LTF Size
- Number of EHT-LTF symbols
- PE related parameters should be the same
Whilst I think the text in your slides when you update during the call is:
1. [20/0545r0] Do you agree that the following indication
should shall be the same considering symbol alignment within each segment from PHY point of view if the fields are present in U-SIG
- Number of EHT-SIG symbols
- GI+EHT-LTF Size
- Number of EHT-LTF symbols
- PE related parameters should be the same
Do you have the meeting minutes? Could you clarify it?
regards
于健 Ross Yu
Huawei Technologies
This email, including its contents and any attachment(s), may contain confidential information of ON Semiconductor and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you may have received this in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete this email,
its contents and any attachment(s).
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1