Hi Xiaogang,
This was discussed in the context of channelization, so it would apply to an AP that sets up a BSS with that BW (i.e 160+80). I see your point and we can discuss it further. If we only allow 240 MHz or 160+80 MHz as reduced BW transmissions
within a 320 MHz BSS, the point may be moot.
Regards,
Sigurd
From: Chen, Xiaogang C <xiaogang.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 4:17 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Revision 9 // Re: Compendium of straw polls and potential changes to SFD posted (20/0566r0)
[External Email]: This email arrived from an external source - Please exercise caution when opening any attachments or clicking on links.
Hi Sigurd,
Can you clarify the definition of 160+80MHz BSS in the SP below? So far the 160+80 is defined as
transmission.
I think we should wait till a 160+80 MHz BSS is defined. maybe we will not have this BSS configuration.
In 160+80 MHz BSS, should the 160 and 80 MHz be non-adjacent?
BRs,
Xiaogang.
From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 10:16 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Revision 9 // Re: Compendium of straw polls and potential changes to SFD posted (20/0566r0)
Acknowledged. The update will be appeared in revision 10 after I incorporate the straw poll results of the MAC ad-hoc call today.
Hello Edward,
Thanks for your effort! The correct version of DCN 226 is r5. I updated a word in this SP in r4 before running in yesterday’s call. I kindly request
you to update document accordingly.
Do you support the addition of the following text to TGbe SFD?
·
A non-AP MLD may update its ability to perform simultaneous transmission and reception on a pair of setup links after multi-link setup.
o
This update for any pair of setup links can be announced by non-AP MLD on any enabled link.
NOTE – Specific signaling for update indication is TBD
NOTE - Limitations on dynamic updating is TBD
[20/0226r4 (MLO Constraint Indication and Operating Mode, Sharan Naribole, Samsung), SP#1, Y/N/A/No answer: 43/7/29/19]
Thanks,
Sharan
From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 9:13 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Revision 9 // Re: Compendium of straw polls and potential changes to SFD posted (20/0566r0)
The update includes:
[1] the straw poll results of the PHY and MAC ad-hoc calls on April 23, 2020, and
[2] potential text changes in sections 2.3.3, 2.4.3, and 6.2 according to the passed straw polls.
Thanks Edward for posting the revised version of the compendium document.
The update includes:
[1] the straw poll results of the PHY and MAC ad-hoc calls on April 20, 2020, and
[3] potential text changes in sections 2.4.1 and 2.5 according to the passed straw polls.
This revision incorporates the straw polls conducted in the April 17th MAC ad-hoc call and the potential changes to Section
6.5 of the SFD. Note that there is no SP conducted in the April 16th Joint call.
Thanks Edward.
From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 4:59 PM
To: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Revision 5 // Re: Compendium of straw polls and potential changes to SFD posted (20/0566r0)
Thanks for your review on the draft meeting minutes and the document.
I've posted revision 5 that updates the SP#3 of 20/0020r3 and the potential change to section 2.4.3:
Thanks Tianyu.
Hi Wook Bong,
Nice catch, I will update the minutes.
Hi Tianyu, Sigurd, and Edward,
Thank you for your effort.
There is one thing needs to be fixed.
During SP#7 in PHY, there was request to change “and” to “and/or” as in below discussion.
Can you update the SP text accordingly?
• Do you agree that 11be STA can recognize the full preamble puncturing pattern it needs by using the BW field and puncturing
information of U-SIG and EHT-SIG field in Multiple user transmission?
– Details for how to convey the puncturing information is TBD.
C: Comment to remove “full”. STA only need its own information not the full information of all STAs.
C: Does it exclude any other options?
A: This is general concept. Other than U-SIG and EHT-SIG we do not have plan.
C: Does this also include SU?
A: No, only for MU. SU case already run.
C: Change and to “and/or”.
C: “11be STA” do you mean only intended 11be STA or any 11be STA that received the PPDU?
A: We don’t think we need to differentiate the cases here.
C: The question is if a STA don’t know where is the primary channel, can they find out the puncture pattern?
A: Need further discussion.
This revision incorporates the straw polls conducted in the PHY ad-hoc on April 13. Potential changes to sections 2.2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3
and 2.5 based on the passed straw polls are included. Note that there is no straw poll in the MAC ad-hoc on April 13.
This latest version incorporates the straw polls conducted in the PHY ad-hoc on April 9. There is no straw poll conducted during the
MAC ad-hoc on April 9. Potential changes to section 2.4.2 based on the passed straw polls are included.
This latest version incorporates the straw polls conducted in the PHY ad-hoc on April 6. There is no straw poll conducted
during the MAC ad-hoc on April 6.
Revision 1 is based that incorporates the straw poll results of the MAC ad-hoc call on March 30, and the joint call on April 2. Sections
6.5 and 9.4 are updated accordingly.
I've posted an initial version of the document that summarizes all the straw poll results (between January 30 and March 30,
except the MAC ad-hoc call on March 30), and potential changes to the latest version of the Specification Framework Document (19/1262r8):
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
This email, including its contents and any attachment(s), may contain confidential information of ON Semiconductor and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you may have received this in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete this email,
its contents and any attachment(s).
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
|