Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 992 - mandatory/optional for MLO

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Laurent,

Please consider the following revisions in the 11-20/0992r2:

Slide 6:

Instead of “Which means that a non-AP MLD shall be at least a single radio non-AP MLD, and may be single radio, enhanced single radio, non-STR multi-radio, STR multi-radio MLD”

consider revising to “ Which means that a non-AP MLD shall be at least a single radio non-AP MLD, and may be enhanced single radio, non-STR multi-radio, STR multi-radio MLD” (since single radio is already mandatory….it should be excluded from the optional list)

SP#7:

On the first bullet, instead of “ shall be capable to receive a PPDU on one each EHT AP link independently to the transmit/reception status on the other affiliated EHT APs links” consider revising to

“shall be capable of receiving a PPDU on any affiliated EHT AP link independently from the transmission/reception status on the other affiliated EHT APs links”

Regards,

Arik

From: Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: יום ד 19 אוגוסט 2020 21:38
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 992 - mandatory/optional for MLO

Hi all,

Starting a thread for Q/A on doc 992 as we ran out of time.

Feel free to ask your questions there, and refer to the SP# to which the question applies.

Just posted below for reference the versions of SPs for SP1 discussed this morning:

Original SP
- An EHT STA that is capable of operating in at least 2 bands shall be part of an MLD
Modified SP (Brian’s suggestion):
- An EHT STA within a device capable of operating in at least 2 bands (or 2 channels within one band) shall be part of an MLD
Suggestion from Yong:
- An EHT STA shall be part of an MLD?

Thanks,

Laurent

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1